Is the Transformed Function a Solution to Laplace's Equation?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating that a transformed function derived from a solution of Laplace's equation remains a solution. The original poster presents a function involving spherical coordinates and seeks to verify its validity as a solution to Laplace's equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the transformation of the function and its implications on the Laplacian. Questions arise regarding the assumptions made in the original poster's approach and the need to compute the Laplacian directly. There are discussions about the relationships between Cartesian and spherical coordinates and how to handle derivatives of the transformed function.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and suggestions for approaching the problem. Some participants have pointed out potential pitfalls in assuming the transformed function is a solution without verification. Others are attempting to clarify the relationships between the variables and derivatives involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted complexity in the calculations involved, particularly when substituting variables and computing derivatives. Participants express challenges in simplifying the expressions and seek further clarification on specific steps in the derivation process.

merrypark3
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that

If [itex]\phi[/itex](x,y,z) is a solution of Laplace's equation, show that
[itex]\frac{1}{r}\phi (\frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} )[/itex] is also a solution


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



let [itex]\psi= \frac{1}{r} \phi (\frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} )[/itex] is a solution.

Then in the spherical coordinate,

[itex]\psi=\frac{1}{r} \phi ( \frac{1}{r} , \theta , \varphi )[/itex]

So input [itex]\psi[/itex] to the spherical laplace equation.

[itex]\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{∂}{∂r} (r^2 \frac{∂\psi}{∂r}) = \frac {2}{r^4} \frac{∂\phi}{∂r} - \frac{1}{r^3} \frac{∂^2 \phi}{∂r^2}[/itex]

The derivation with other angles, same to the original one, except 1/r times factor.

But the r part for the original one is

[itex]\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{∂}{∂r} (r^2 \frac{∂\phi}{∂r}) = \frac {2}{r} \frac{∂\phi}{∂r} + \frac{∂^2 \phi}{∂r^2}[/itex]

What's wrong with me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
merrypark3 said:
let [itex]\psi= \frac{1}{r} \phi (\frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} )[/itex] is a solution.

Here you are assuming what you are trying to prove. That is not usually a good idea.

Instead, just compute the Laplacian of [itex]\psi= \frac{1}{r} \phi (\frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} )[/itex] and show that it is zero if [itex]\nabla^2 \phi(x,y,z)=0[/itex]

Then in the spherical coordinate,

[itex]\psi=\frac{1}{r} \phi ( \frac{1}{r} , \theta , \varphi )[/itex]

No. What are [itex]x[/itex], [itex]y[/itex] and [itex]z[/itex] in terms of spherical coordinates [itex]r[/itex], [itex]\theta[/itex] and [itex]\varphi[/itex]? What does that make [itex]\frac{x}{r^2}[/itex], [itex]\frac{y}{r^2}[/itex], and [itex]\frac{z}{r^2}[/itex]?
 


[itex]\psi= \frac{1}{r} \phi (\frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} )= \frac{1}{r} \phi(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r}, \frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r},\frac{cos \theta}{r})[/itex]

[itex]\frac{∂}{∂r} \phi(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r}, \frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r},\frac{cos \theta}{r})= -( \frac{ sin\theta cos\varphi}{r^2} \frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r})}+\frac{ sin\theta sin\varphi}{r^2} \frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r})}+\frac{ cos\theta}{r^2}\frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r})} )[/itex]

Then how can I calculate the terms like [itex]\frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r})}[/itex]?
 
merrypark3 said:
[itex]\psi= \frac{1}{r} \phi (\frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} )= \frac{1}{r} \phi(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r}, \frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r},\frac{cos \theta}{r})[/itex]

good.

[itex]\frac{∂}{∂r} \phi(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r}, \frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r},\frac{cos \theta}{r})= -( \frac{ sin\theta cos\varphi}{r^2} \frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r})}+\frac{ sin\theta sin\varphi}{r^2} \frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r})}+\frac{ cos\theta}{r^2}\frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r})} )[/itex]

Then how can I calculate the terms like [itex]\frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r})}[/itex]?

Just use a substitution like [itex]\bar{x} \equiv \frac{\sin \theta \cos\varphi}{r}[/itex], [itex]\bar{y} \equiv \frac{\sin \theta \sin\varphi}{r}[/itex], and [itex]\bar{z} \equiv \frac{\cos \theta}{r}[/itex] to make it easier to write:

[tex]\frac{\partial \phi\left( \frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} \right)}{\partial (\frac{\sin \theta \cos\varphi}{r})} = \frac{ \partial \phi( \bar{x}, \bar{y}, \bar{z})}{ \partial \bar{x}}[/tex]?

In the end, you should get something like [itex]\nabla^2 \psi = \text{some factor} * \left[ \frac{ \partial^2 \phi( \bar{x}, \bar{y}, \bar{z})}{ \partial^2 \bar{x}} + \frac{ \partial^2 \phi( \bar{x}, \bar{y}, \bar{z})}{ \partial^2 \bar{y}} + \frac{ \partial^2 \phi( \bar{x}, \bar{y}, \bar{z})}{ \partial^2 \bar{z}} \right][/itex]

Aside: Changing the size on all your posts makes them difficult to read (for my eyes anyways), please stop it.
 
I am stuck on this too

Hi!

I was just trying to solve this problem through this same approach (make the substitutions [itex]\overline{x}=\sin(\theta)\cos(\phi)/r[/itex], etc...). But it turns out to be *very* complicated. Do you have finished this one? Can you show me more explicit steps? Thanks a lot!
 

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K