Is the unitary operator unique?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Demon117
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
Demon117
Messages
162
Reaction score
1
So there is a theorem at the beginning of section 1.5 in Sakurai that states the following:

Given two sets of base kets, both satisfying orthonormality and completeness. there exists a unitary operator [itex]U[/itex] such that

[itex]|b^{(1)}> = U|a^{(1)}>,|b^{(2)}> = U|a^{(2)}>,...,|b^{(n)}> = U|a^{(n)}>[/itex]

By a unitary operator we mean an operator fulfilling the conditions

[itex]U^{t}U=1[/itex]

as well as

[itex]UU^{t}=1[/itex]

So this is not difficult to prove. But my real question is can we prove that [itex]U[/itex] is unique or is that just not the case and why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The elements of U are [itex]U_{nm} = \langle a_n | U | a_m \rangle = \langle a_n | b_m \rangle,[/itex] so if you fix the basis sets then you fix U.
 
Physics Monkey said:
The elements of U are [itex]U_{nm} = \langle a_n | U | a_m \rangle = \langle a_n | b_m \rangle,[/itex] so if you fix the basis sets then you fix U.

That is what I thought, but I wanted a second opinion. Thank you.