Is the unitary operator unique?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Demon117
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator
Demon117
Messages
162
Reaction score
1
So there is a theorem at the beginning of section 1.5 in Sakurai that states the following:

Given two sets of base kets, both satisfying orthonormality and completeness. there exists a unitary operator U such that

|b^{(1)}> = U|a^{(1)}>,|b^{(2)}> = U|a^{(2)}>,...,|b^{(n)}> = U|a^{(n)}>

By a unitary operator we mean an operator fulfilling the conditions

U^{t}U=1

as well as

UU^{t}=1

So this is not difficult to prove. But my real question is can we prove that U is unique or is that just not the case and why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The elements of U are U_{nm} = \langle a_n | U | a_m \rangle = \langle a_n | b_m \rangle, so if you fix the basis sets then you fix U.
 
Physics Monkey said:
The elements of U are U_{nm} = \langle a_n | U | a_m \rangle = \langle a_n | b_m \rangle, so if you fix the basis sets then you fix U.

That is what I thought, but I wanted a second opinion. Thank you.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top