Is the Universe Flat Without Volume?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ddjj77
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flat Universe
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of a "flat" universe in cosmology, clarifying that "flat" refers to a three-dimensional Euclidean space that is not curved, rather than implying a lack of volume. Participants highlight the common misconception that flatness equates to two-dimensionality, emphasizing that diagrams often simplify complex three-dimensional concepts into two dimensions for illustration purposes. Lawrence Krauss's lecture is referenced to further explain the distinctions between open, closed, and flat universes, reinforcing the need to understand these terms within their scientific context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic cosmological concepts
  • Familiarity with Euclidean geometry
  • Knowledge of dimensionality in physics
  • Exposure to lectures or discussions by physicists like Lawrence Krauss
NEXT STEPS
  • Watch Lawrence Krauss's lecture on cosmology for deeper insights
  • Research the implications of a flat universe in modern physics
  • Explore the differences between open, closed, and flat universes
  • Study the geometry of space-time and its representation in diagrams
USEFUL FOR

Students of cosmology, physics enthusiasts, and anyone seeking to understand the complexities of the universe's geometry and its implications in modern science.

ddjj77
Messages
64
Reaction score
4
It's been said that the universe is flat. How can it be flat if flatness has no volume?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Maybe "flat" isn't the right term; 2-dimensional would be more accurate (see attached image). What would you call a shape with no thickness? Volumeless?
Universe shape.JPG
 
ddjj77 said:
Maybe "flat" isn't the right term; 2-dimensional would be more accurate (see attached image). What would you call a shape with no thickness? Volumeless?

Those are 2D surfaces. The reason that a lot of diagrams use 2D to represent the universe is that, although you could represent the "flat" universe as a 3D box, you can't draw a curved 3D surface (you'd need 4D for that, which we don't have).

So, these diagrams lose a dimension in order to illustrate the concept of curved space.

It's interesting that you've taken the concept of "flat" so literally.
 
PS Lawrence Krauss explains this right at the start of his lecture here:

 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
I thought flat was flat.
Krauss said "..it's open, closed, or flat."
 
ddjj77 said:
I thought flat was flat.
Krauss said "..it's open, closed, or flat."

No, "flat" in cosmology means 3D but not curved. "Flat" in everyday speech means 2D.

That is an intellectual hurdle you are going to have to jump.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 563992 and davenn
PeroK said:
PS Lawrence Krauss explains this right at the start of his lecture here:

thanks for that video
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
831
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K