ddjj77
- 64
- 4
It's been said that the universe is flat. How can it be flat if flatness has no volume?
The discussion centers on the concept of a "flat" universe in cosmology, clarifying that "flat" refers to a three-dimensional Euclidean space that is not curved, rather than implying a lack of volume. Participants highlight the common misconception that flatness equates to two-dimensionality, emphasizing that diagrams often simplify complex three-dimensional concepts into two dimensions for illustration purposes. Lawrence Krauss's lecture is referenced to further explain the distinctions between open, closed, and flat universes, reinforcing the need to understand these terms within their scientific context.
PREREQUISITESStudents of cosmology, physics enthusiasts, and anyone seeking to understand the complexities of the universe's geometry and its implications in modern science.
ddjj77 said:It's been said that the universe is flat. How can it be flat if flatness has no volume?
ddjj77 said:Maybe "flat" isn't the right term; 2-dimensional would be more accurate (see attached image). What would you call a shape with no thickness? Volumeless?
ddjj77 said:I thought flat was flat.
Krauss said "..it's open, closed, or flat."
PeroK said:PS Lawrence Krauss explains this right at the start of his lecture here: