Is the use of materials to confine nuclear fusion ruled out?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using materials to confine nuclear fusion reactions, particularly focusing on the limits of materials under extreme conditions of temperature and pressure. Participants explore concepts related to magnetic confinement, material properties, and the implications of rapid heating and cooling in fusion environments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that while materials close to the fusion cavity may vaporize due to high temperatures, the outer shell might remain intact if the process occurs rapidly.
  • There is a concern that evaporating material could cool the plasma too quickly, which may hinder the fusion process.
  • Some argue that pressure is not a significant issue for fusion plasma, which can exist below atmospheric pressure.
  • Participants discuss the potential for continuous fusion versus pulsed fusion, with differing opinions on the effectiveness of each approach.
  • One participant notes that even small amounts of impurities can severely damage the plasma, necessitating high vacuum conditions for fusion plasma.
  • A historical reference is made to Project PACER, which explored the use of thermonuclear explosives in confinement scenarios.
  • Another participant mentions that the process used by LPP Fusion involves fast pulses, indicating an alternative approach to continuous fusion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the viability of using materials for fusion confinement, with no consensus on the effectiveness of different approaches or the implications of material properties under fusion conditions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about material behavior under extreme conditions, the dependence on specific material properties, and unresolved questions regarding the impact of rapid heating and cooling on plasma stability.

Imarobot
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Usually people talk about magnetic confinement schemes or some such thing for fusion reactions presumably because the pressure and temperatures would vaporize/destroy all conceived material vessels too quickly. I would like to hear someone talk about the limits of materials in this realm. So, for example what pressures would a 3 inch diameter ball of high grade steel surrounding a 1 mm cavity withstand? how about 6 feet diameter of surrounding steel? The material close to the cavity would definitely vaporize due to temperature but that does not mean the rest of the shell will if everything is done quickly.

The thinking would be to increase the temperature and pressure of the fuel very rapidly before the material casing would be destroyed. This could be done electromagnetically maybe if steel were replaced with some other very strong material that is not a good conductor and the fuel is made to be conductive (think induction/eddy currents). Any thoughts on this subject are appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Imarobot said:
The material close to the cavity would definitely vaporize due to temperature but that does not mean the rest of the shell will if everything is done quickly.
The evaporating material cools down the plasma way too fast, and there is no way to avoid this. Every material that would help in containing the plasma also would cool it down way too much.

Pressure is no problem. Fusion plasma is often below atmospheric pressure, and the record is just twice the atmospheric pressure.
 
...and you would want the fusion to be continuous so you could harness it.
 
russ_watters said:
...and you would want the fusion to be continuous so you could harness it.
Not necessarily, many fast pulses would also work if there would be a good way to generate them.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mheslep
Thanks for the responses. I bet conduction away by materials is the problem, among others.

Vaporization of the material on the inside of the cavity would spike the pressure... I would think this would keep the temperature up but 30 million deg kelvin may be too high a bar.
 
The problem is that even a very small amount of impurities can severely damage the plasma. That's a big reason why fusion plasma's require such high vaccums.
 
To: Imarobot

What you're proposing (sort of) was studied in Project PACER, initiated at Livermore in the 1960's.

PACER called for exploding small thermonuclear explosives (H-bombs) in caves or steel vessels.

The concept has been studied sporadically in the last few decades. See Wikipedia.
 
mfb said:
Not necessarily, many fast pulses would also work if there would be a good way to generate them.

That's apparently how LPP Fusions's process works.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
16K