Is the VLSI field oversaturated?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maxwell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Vlsi
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on concerns about the saturation of the VLSI field, particularly in the context of job availability for non-US citizens in the defense industry. The original poster is contemplating a broader specialization in electrical engineering, such as control systems or signal processing, while still incorporating VLSI courses. They express interest in communications, having enjoyed related coursework, and consider combining it with VLSI for a more versatile skill set. Another participant emphasizes that signal processing remains a strong field with widespread applicability, suggesting it may offer better job prospects. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of choosing a specialization that balances personal interest with market demand.
Maxwell
Messages
511
Reaction score
0
I am trying to decide on my area specialization for graduate school. I really like VLSI design. However, I get the feeling that because VLSI jobs are not common in the defense industry, the field is very saturated with people who don't have other options for EE work in the US (non-US citizens).

For that reason, I am considering another area of specialization that is more useful across the entire EE industry spectrum. Control systems or signal processing, for example. I am definitely going to pair some VLSI courses with these topics, but I would not be going fully towards VLSI. Therefore, I would be able to apply for a larger range of jobs.

Does anyone in the industry have any opinions? I could be really off target (I hope so), so please let me know.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Are you interested in communication systems? That's the hot EE field right now, according to IEEE.
 
Well, I've taken two communications classes, and I did enjoy them. One of them was a digital comm class and I actually liked it a lot. Viterbi algorithm, trellis codes, etc. were all pretty interesting. That's one possible route - to combine communications and VLSI classes. I'm more of a circuits/electronics person, so if I'm going the comm. route, I'd like to design wireless chips. I was thinking about taking a low power design for wireless circuits course.

I'm happy I took a huge amount of EE electives during undergrad so I'm able to make an informed decision before I just jump into a field, but the problem is I don't want to choose just one. One week I'm interested in one area, and the next week I'm interested in something else. It's all very interesting, but it's hard to say what I want to specialize in.

Have you decided what you're going to do?
 
Maxwell said:
Well, I've taken two communications classes, and I did enjoy them. One of them was a digital comm class and I actually liked it a lot. Viterbi algorithm, trellis codes, etc. were all pretty interesting. That's one possible route - to combine communications and VLSI classes. I'm more of a circuits/electronics person, so if I'm going the comm. route, I'd like to design wireless chips. I was thinking about taking a low power design for wireless circuits course.

I'm happy I took a huge amount of EE electives during undergrad so I'm able to make an informed decision before I just jump into a field, but the problem is I don't want to choose just one. One week I'm interested in one area, and the next week I'm interested in something else. It's all very interesting, but it's hard to say what I want to specialize in.

Have you decided what you're going to do?

device physics/physical electronics. I will be starting graduate school (PhD) in fall '08 studying physics or possibly electrical engineering, but either way it will be in the device physics field. I'm not sure which degree will better suit me for that field. Either one would work, I would think.
 
There were generally two subjects I really became obsessed with in my double major in EE and physics...they were fields and solid state devices.
 
It's true that purely digital designers are seen as being rather easy to find. In my opinion, signal processing (both analog and digital) is an excellent field, since it's applicable almost everywhere. You'll never have a hard time finding a way to apply your skill set. This is true now, and will continue to be true for the forseeable future.

- Warren
 
I am trying to understand how transferring electric from the powerplant to my house is more effective using high voltage. The suggested explanation that the current is equal to the power supply divided by the voltage, and hence higher voltage leads to lower current and as a result to a lower power loss on the conductives is very confusing me. I know that the current is determined by the voltage and the resistance, and not by a power capability - which defines a limit to the allowable...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K