Is there a better way to estimate chances of admission to a PhD program?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bjnartowt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reading Statistics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around estimating the chances of admission to PhD programs, particularly in physics and mathematics. Participants explore various methods and factors that could influence these chances, including personal qualifications, institutional differences, and statistical comparisons.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests calculating admission chances based on the ratio of accepted to applied students, but questions the reliability of this method given varying competitiveness among programs.
  • Another participant proposes comparing personal qualifications to those of current students and consulting references for insights on admission chances, highlighting discrepancies in admission standards for domestic versus international applicants.
  • A participant expresses skepticism about the value of advice from advisers compared to published resources, particularly regarding specific programs like Rutgers.
  • It is mentioned that advisers may have valuable insights from their experience with past students and knowledge of the content of recommendation letters.
  • One participant argues against trying to quantify admission chances, citing the randomness of the process and the importance of personal interviews.
  • Another point raised is the variability in admission quality across different schools, suggesting that comparing GRE scores could provide a better gauge of admission odds.
  • A recommendation is made to apply to multiple schools rather than focusing on a single institution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best methods for estimating admission chances, with no consensus on a definitive approach. Some emphasize the randomness of the process, while others suggest specific metrics for evaluation.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the potential influence of factors such as domestic versus international applicant standards, the variability of admission criteria across programs, and the subjective nature of personal qualifications and interviews.

Who May Find This Useful

Prospective PhD applicants in physics and mathematics, particularly those seeking insights into the admissions process and how to assess their chances of acceptance.

bjnartowt
Messages
265
Reaction score
3
Hi all, I'm wondering how to gauge the chances i have of making it into a PhD program.

First approximation: took ratio of accepted students to number of students who applied.

But: that produced a 116/487 = 24% chance of being admitted to U-Cal San Diego, verses a 45/260 = 18% chance of being admitted to Rutgers. I hear Rutgers is less competitive than San Diego.

Suggestions on other ways to improve this first approximation of "chances of successfully-being-admitted"? Perhaps other factors need to enter into some sort of linear combination? :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could try to compare your own qualifications to the resumes of current graduate students. Or ask your references about your chances :)

Be careful with overall admission statistics because many programs have a huge discrepancy between their admission standards for domestic and international students. I have only heard this about math (my own field) but I am confident that it applies to physics as well. I remember one professor announcing at a grad school info session at a national conference, "If you score at the 90th percentile of the math subject GRE, you are better than most of our American applicants and worse than any of the Chinese."
 
Ha ha...

But I wonder: what would my advisers know that the APS book wouldn't? For instance, I am wondering if I can get into Rutgers. But their condensed matter physics is said to be like top 20.
 
They might have guided several generations of students through the graduate admission process and observed patterns which students are accepted or rejected. They also know the content of their own letters, which will likely make or break your application :)
 
bjnartowt said:
Suggestions on other ways to improve this first approximation of "chances of successfully-being-admitted"? Perhaps other factors need to enter into some sort of linear combination? :)

I would suggest not doing this at all. It won't improve your chances, nor will it help you sleep at night. There is too much of a random factor (as well as how you come across in interviews) to be able to make even an educated guess at something like this. :smile:
 
The other thing that makes thing misleading is that the quality of the admissions can vary wildly from school to school. What gives you a better gauge of your odds of admission is to look at the median GRE physics score and then compare it to what you get.

Also, I'd strong suggest that you apply to several schools, and not to have your heart set on one particular school.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K