Is There a Combinatorial Identity for This Curious Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter icystrike
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that the combinatorial identity presented, \(\sum^{r-1}_{k=0} \binom{n-1}{r-(k+1)} \times \binom{r}{k} = \binom{n+r-1}{r-1}\), is indeed Vandermonde's identity. Participants clarified that by substituting \(m = r\) and adjusting the index \(k\), the identity can be derived directly from the established formula. The identity is useful for counting distinct nonnegative integer-valued vectors that satisfy the equation \(x_{1}+x_{2}+\ldots+x_{r}=n\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of combinatorial identities, specifically Vandermonde's identity.
  • Familiarity with binomial coefficients, denoted as \(\binom{n}{k}\).
  • Basic knowledge of generating functions and their applications in combinatorics.
  • Experience with integer partitions and their significance in combinatorial problems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Vandermonde's identity in combinatorial proofs.
  • Explore advanced topics in combinatorics, such as generating functions and their role in counting problems.
  • Learn about integer partitions and their connections to combinatorial identities.
  • Investigate other combinatorial identities that relate to binomial coefficients, such as the Hockey-Stick identity.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, combinatorial theorists, and students studying discrete mathematics who are interested in combinatorial identities and their applications in counting problems.

icystrike
Messages
444
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Hello PF! This is not a homework problem but I am curious to know if the following combinatorial identity exist:

[tex]\sum^{r-1}_{k=0} (^{n-1}_{r-(k+1)}) \times (^{r}_{k}) = (^{n+r-1}_{r-1})[/tex]


Much thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CompuChip said:
Yes, it is called http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vandermonde's_identity]Vandermonde's[/PLAIN] identity.

If you plug in m = r in the first formula given in that link, and shift k ==> k - 1, you get exactly what you wrote.

Thank you! It is indeed Vandermonde's identity with n, m and r substituted with n-1, r, and r-1 respectively.

I wrote this above identity as inspired by finding the number of distinct nonnegative integer-valued vectors [itex](x_{1},x_{2},...,x_{r})[/itex] satisfying:

[itex]x_{1}+x_{2}+...x_{r}=n[/itex]​
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
54
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K