Is there a connection between sound waves and gravity waves?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the potential relationship between sound waves and gravitational waves, focusing on whether the speed of sound in matter can be derived from the energy of gravitational waves. Participants also touch on the nature of gravitational waves, their effects, and the distinction between gravitational waves and gravity waves.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question if there is a direct relationship between sound waves and gravitational waves, specifically regarding the derivation of sound speed from gravitational wave energy.
  • One participant asserts that sound waves and gravitational waves are unrelated.
  • There is a discussion about the LIGO signal and its audible frequency, with some noting that gravitational waves can create oscillations in matter, though these oscillations are not sound-like.
  • Participants differentiate between gravitational waves and gravity waves, with one noting that gravity waves (like those on water) share similarities with sound waves.
  • Speculation arises about the physical effects of gravitational waves on matter, including the potential for humans to feel these waves at a certain distance from a black hole merger.
  • Concerns are raised about the electromagnetic radiation accompanying gravitational wave events, with discussions on the conditions under which gravitational waves might be the only emissions.
  • One participant introduces a metaphor involving "bead on a string" to describe energy transfer from gravitational waves to matter, suggesting a complex interaction that involves distance and energy dissipation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between sound waves and gravitational waves, with no consensus reached. There are also competing perspectives on the effects of gravitational waves and the nature of emissions during black hole mergers.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of the topic, including the need for ideal conditions to isolate gravitational waves from other forms of radiation. The discussion highlights the assumptions regarding the presence of matter and the conditions surrounding black hole mergers.

jerromyjon
Messages
1,244
Reaction score
189
I'm curious if there is any relation between sound waves and gravity waves. I don't mean as an analogy. I mean can the speed of sound in matter be derived from the energy of gravity waves.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, not at all.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bcrowell
Unrelated to the OP's question - one of the pop sound-bites going around is that of the LIGO signal from the merging BHs played as sound.

These particular gravitational waves have a frequency in the audible range of hearing. It's the bloip! at the end of this recording:
https://www.ligo.caltech.edu/video/ligo20160211v2
 
DaveC426913 said:
These particular gravitational waves have a frequency in the audible range of hearing
That means technically that the waves create that sound in all matter it passes through. The LIGO equipment is really just amplifying it.
 
jerromyjon said:
That means technically that the waves create that sound in all matter it passes through.
They do create oscillations, but those are not sound-like.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bcrowell
mfb said:
They do create oscillations, but those are not sound-like.
...in magnitude.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Unrelated to the OP's question - one of the pop sound-bites going around is that of the LIGO signal from the merging BHs played as sound.

These particular gravitational waves have a frequency in the audible range of hearing. It's the bloip! at the end of this recording:
https://www.ligo.caltech.edu/video/ligo20160211v2

There is a difference between gravity waves and gravitational waves.
 
Oh, good point. As this thread is in the relativity forum, I read it as gravitational waves. Gravity waves (e.g. waves on a water surface) do have a lot in common with sound waves.
 
Looking at it from the center out I imagine anywhere near this event we detected the gravitational waves would rip everything to shreds. I figure there is a distance boundary where humans could place themselves away from this event and feel the "bloip" pass through your body like a loudspeaker at a concert... would you also hear it exactly like a sound? The obvious difference being you'd see it the same time you'd hear it, and I'm thinking you'd feel it much more strongly and it would sound soft.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
OK, it would seem you really did mean gravitational waves.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
jerromyjon said:
Looking at it from the center out I imagine anywhere near this event we detected the gravitational waves would rip everything to shreds. I figure there is a distance boundary where humans could place themselves away from this event and feel the "bloip" pass through your body like a loudspeaker at a concert
There are quite few discussions going on here, and on other fora, as well as in some news articles about exactly that. I was surprised to learn that you have to be quite close to experience much of an effect. Some estimates are 'closer than 10,000km', whereas others are 'near or within the event horizon itself' where you would feel a spacetime distortion of 'more than a millimetre or two'.

We are talking here only about the impact of gravitational waves - ignoring the apocalyptic-level EM radiation inevitably experienced by proximity to a BH merge.
 
  • #12
DaveC426913 said:
ignoring the apocalypic-level EM radiation inevitably experienced by proximity to a BH merge.
Yeah, I could hear it just before my ears would melt off my head! I guess there are more than just gravitational waves to count for 3 suns worth of mass being lost?
 
  • #13
DaveC426913 said:
We are talking here only about the impact of gravitational waves - ignoring the apocalypic-level EM radiation inevitably experienced by proximity to a BH merge.
But nothing "except" gravitational waves escapes from what I keep reading... even the ringdown is the out of equilibrium mass settling internally.
 
  • #14
DaveC426913 said:
EM radiation inevitably experienced by proximity to a BH merge.
Ah, but perhaps that's the ticket after all. Instead of bead on a string I'm thinking bead on a wire...
 
  • #15
jerromyjon said:
But nothing "except" gravitational waves escapes from what I keep reading... even the ringdown is the out of equilibrium mass settling internally.
Well, in an ideal setup, sure - like in a large volume of hard vacuum, with no accretion disc and no infalling dust or gas.
 
  • #16
DaveC426913 said:
like in a large volume of hard vacuum, with no infalling dust or gas
But if you were in a field of dust wouldn't it glow as the waves pass?
 
  • #17
jerromyjon said:
But if you were in a field of dust wouldn't it glow as the waves pass?
Perhaps I misunderstood what you were asking.

I thought what you were saying was 'in a black hole merge, the only thing that would be emitted is gravitational waves - no EMR'. And I'm saying that would only be the case in an ideal setup, where there is no accreted matter outside the EH. In reality, the merge would presumably result in a large emission of EMR from the matter disc.
 
  • #18
jerromyjon said:
Ah, but perhaps that's the ticket after all. Instead of bead on a string I'm thinking bead on a wire...
I don't know what this means.
 
  • #19
The bead on the string is the thought about how a sticky bead on a string could displace gravitational wave energy in the form of heat energy into matter through friction, confirming the validity of the presumption that 3 suns worth of mass/energy was expelled in a very brief period. Just saying the inverse square law thing still has to get me quite a distance away before a very small fraction of the suns magnitude worth of energy passes through the space I'm taking up as it passes quickly imparting a small amount of energy into everything the waves passes which offers resistance (matter) but travels freely in vacuum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
5K