Is there a constant value for b in b^x (ln b) = a^x for any x?

  • Level: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Werg22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
7 replies · 2K views
Werg22
Messages
1,431
Reaction score
1
Is it possible to find a constant value for b in the following equality for any value of x?

[tex]b^{x}(\ln b) = a^x[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what is a? Is it given? If so, in what field is it an element.
 
a can be any value, so the real question is to find b in relationship to a, independantly of x.
 
Last edited:
Since you didn't answer the question "in what field is it an element?" I assume this is in the real numbers.

[tex]b^{x}(\ln b) = a^x[/tex]
Taking ln of both sides:
[tex]ln(b^x ln b)= ln b^x + ln b= xln b+ ln b= x ln a[/tex]
so
[tex]x(ln a- ln b)= x ln\frac{a}{b}= ln b[/tex]
That will be "independent of x" if and only if
[tex]ln \frac{a}{b}= 0[/tex]
or
a= b= 1.
 
I think you made a mistake

You're development:

[tex]\ln(b^x \ln b)= \ln b^x + \ln b[/tex]

When it should be

[tex]\ln(b^x \ln b)= \ln b^x + \ln(\ln b)[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Werg22 said:
Is it possible to find a constant value for b in the following equality for any value of x?
[tex]b^{x}(\ln b) = a^x[/tex]
Suppose [tex]a,b\in\mathbb{R}^+[/tex]. If [tex]b^x\ln b=a^x[/tex] then we have
[tex]x\ln b+\ln\ln b=x\ln a[/tex]
or
[tex]\ln\ln b=x(\ln a-\ln b)[/tex].

If [tex]a\neq b[/tex] then this will not hold for all [tex]x\in\mathbb{R}[/tex]. Then we have a=b and [tex]\ln\ln b=0[/tex]. This means the unique solution is [tex]a=b=e[/tex].
 
Does that mean that the function a^x has no integral function if a is not equal to e?
 
Werg22 said:
Does that mean that the function a^x has no integral function if a is not equal to e?
?
[tex]a^x= e^{ln a^x}= e^{x ln a}[/tex]
so the anti-derivative (I guess that's what you mean by "integral function") is
[tex]\frac{e^{x ln a}}{ln a}= \frac{a^x}{ln a}[/itex].<br /> <br /> Yes, werg22. Thanks for the correction.[/tex]