Is There a Faster Way to Find Conjugacy Classes in Group Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter catcherintherye
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classes
Click For Summary
Finding conjugacy classes in group theory can be time-consuming, and while some shortcuts exist, such as the intersection theorem, no significantly faster method has been identified. The process typically involves calculating the orbit of elements and their conjugates, which can be tedious. For those seeking efficiency, using computational tools like GAP can automate the calculation of conjugacy classes. Additionally, certain theorems related to the order of the group and the number of conjugacy classes may provide insights that reduce the workload. Ultimately, while there are some strategies to streamline the process, the fundamental calculations remain necessary.
catcherintherye
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if anyone knows a more efficient method of finding conjugacy classes than the one i am currently using.
tex/ Example D_6* =<x,y| x^3=1, y^4=1, yx=x^2y>

now to find the conjugacy classes of this group i would first write out
the orbit of x <x> ={ 1x1, xxx^2, x^2xx, yxy^3,...x^2y^2xy^2x^2,...etc}

then i would use the set relation yx=(x^2)y to work out each of these 12 conjugates individually. Once this is done i continue with <x^2>, <y> etc...

..the only short cut i have found is the theorem that says <x>intersection<y> = empty set or <x>=<y>. But even with this surely there is a quicker way??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

In terms of finding the conjugacy classes, there doesn't look to be a faster way. I mean, if you actually wanted to know what they are, how would you get them without doing the calculations? If you don't want to do them by hand, I recommend GAP: http://www-gap.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/
It will compute conjugacy classes for you.

There are some other theorems that might save you some time. For example, if G has odd order g, and if h is the number of conjugacy classes of G, then g = h (mod 16). Once you have computed most of the classes, this will probably tell you if the rest of the elements form a single conjugacy class or not. There is another variant of this theorem which says that if all of the primes dividing g are congruent to 1 (mod m), then g = h (mod 2m^2).
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-9890(199505)102%3A5<440%3ACRTOOA>2.0.CO%3B2-%23
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
560
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
881
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
557
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
864
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K