Is there a Linear Transformation

Click For Summary
A linear transformation T from R^3 to R^2 can be defined with specific mappings for given vectors, such as T(1,-1,1)=(1,0) and T(1,1,1)=(0,1). To prove the existence of such a transformation, it's essential to include a third linearly independent vector in R^3, allowing for the spanning of R^3. This ensures that any vector in R^3 can be expressed as a linear combination of these vectors, which is crucial for fulfilling the linear transformation requirements. The transformation can indeed map to any vector in R^2, but it is not unique, as different choices for the third vector's image can yield various valid transformations. Thus, while the transformation exists, its non-uniqueness is an important consideration.
Chillguy
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


From Hoffman and Kunze:

Is there a linear transformation T from R^3 to R^2 such that T(1,-1,1)=(1,0) and T(1,1,1)=(0,1)?

Homework Equations


T(c\alpha+\beta)=cT(\alpha)+T(\beta)

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't really understand how to prove that there is a linear transformation with these coordinates. I think I begin by defining another arbitrary, linearly independent, transformation such as T(1,0,0)=(1,1). Then I don't really know where to go from here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Chillguy said:
I think I begin by defining another arbitrary, linearly independent, transformation such as T(1,0,0)=(1,1).

Think about how this helps you along with the requirement that T is a linear transformation. For example, what does your requirement that having the transformation of another linearly independent vector in R3 give you?
 
Orodruin said:
Think about how this helps you along with the requirement that T is a linear transformation. For example, what does your requirement that having the transformation of another linearly independent vector in R3 give you?
It would allow me to span R3 with these three vectors
 
Chillguy said:
It would allow me to span R3 with these three vectors

And thus the transformation of any vector in R3 can be written as ...
 
... can be written as T(c\alpha_i+\beta_i)?
where alpha and beta are vectors in R3
 
Well, you need to define what your ##\alpha## and ##\beta## etc are. You have three vectors with which you can express any vector in R3 as a linear combination. What will be the resulting transformation of such a linear combination? Will it fulfil the requirements you have?
 
The resulting combination will be a vector in R^2, I think it could be any vector in R^2?
 
No, not if you already have fixed it for three vectors. Use the linear property of T! Let us say you have the vectors ##v_1, v_2, v_3## and have fixed ##T(v_i) = u_i## for ##i = 1,2,3##. Now you take a linear combination of those ##v = \sum_i c_i v_i##. What is ##T(v)##?
 
T(v)=T(c*v_1+c*v_2+c*v_3)
Which I can then apply the definition of a linear transformation as defined before?
 
  • #10
Yes. So does this linear transformation fulfil the requirements?
 
  • #11
Yes! it does! Thank you so much. It makes much more sense now. I just have one other question, why do the vectors need to span all of R^3 in the first place? Is it so the transformation can go to any place in R^2?
 
  • #12
Unless you specify the transformation for any arbitrary vector in R3 you have not really found a linear transformation from R3 to R2 but only from a two-dimensional subspace. A more complete answer would be: Yes, it exists, but is not unique. (You could have selected any vector in R2 as the image of your third linearly independent vector in R3).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K