Is There a More Efficient Way to Multiply Polynomials?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter livindesert
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the methods for multiplying polynomials, specifically exploring alternatives to the F.O.I.L. method. Participants examine the underlying principles of polynomial multiplication and the application of the distributive property.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether there are different methods to solve basic polynomial multiplication beyond the F.O.I.L. method.
  • Another participant emphasizes that while the order of terms in multiplication does not matter, all relevant terms must be included, likening polynomial multiplication to standard multiplication of numbers.
  • There is a request for clarification on what F.O.I.L. means, with a subsequent explanation provided that it refers to the method of multiplying two binomials.
  • A participant describes the general rule for multiplying sums, detailing how each term in one polynomial must multiply every term in the other, providing a structured breakdown of the process.
  • Another participant discusses the application of the distributive property to polynomial multiplication, illustrating the concept with an example involving two polynomials.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the fundamental principles of polynomial multiplication, but there is no consensus on the necessity or efficiency of the F.O.I.L. method versus other approaches. The discussion remains open-ended regarding the exploration of alternative methods.

Contextual Notes

Some participants provide detailed explanations of polynomial multiplication, but there are no explicit assumptions or limitations noted in the discussion.

livindesert
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Is their a different way to solve basic polynomials without the F.O.I.L. method?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You mean to multiply polynomials? Well, the order of the terms isn't important, but you need all the relevant terms.

This is like asking if there's a different way to mutiply 27 x 68. In the end, you're sill going to get four terms: 1200 + 160 + 420 + 56. That we're generally taught to start with the last (56) and to carry (adding incrementally instead of getting four separate terms) doesn't change the fundamental nature of the process.
 
livindesert,

What does F.O.I.L. mean?

Ratch
 
Ratch said:
livindesert,

What does F.O.I.L. mean?

Ratch

"First, outer, inner, last", I assume, referring to the process of multiplying two binomials.

Fun(ny) fact: One of my abstract algebra professors (discussing polynomials as a unique factorization domain) once threatened physical harm on a student who mentioned "FOIL" in class.
 
The general rule is, when you are multiplying sums, each term of the first sum must multiply each term of the second and then added.

In particular, if both sums have two members, (ax+ b)(cx+ d), The "ax" must multiply both "cx" and "d" giving [itex]acx^2[/itex] and [itex]adx[/itex]. The "b" must multiply both "cx" and "d" giving [itex]bcx[/itex] and [itex]bd[/itex]. Adding those, [itex](ax+ b)(cx+ d)= acx^2+ adx+ bcx+ bd= acx^2+ (ad+ bc)x+ bd[/itex].

"FOIL" just makes sure all of those four multiplications are done. If we have two sums each with three terms, say (ax+ by+ c)(dx+ ey+ f), "each term in the first sum multiplies each term in the second sum", gives [itex]adx^2+ aexy+ afx+ bdxy+ bey^2+ bfy+ cdx+ cdy+ cf= adx^2+ (ae+ bd)xy+ bey^2+ (af+ cd)x+ (bf+ cd)y+ cf[/itex]
 
In general, multiplying polynomials follow directly from the distributive property of multiplication, that is, [itex]a(b+c)=ab+ac[/itex]. This follows from the definition of multiplication. Now, we apply it to an arbitrary product of polynomials as follows. Let's say we have [itex](2a+b)(3c+2d)[/itex]. What we do is to apply the rule once to get [itex]2a(3c+2d)+b(3c+2d)[/itex] and then apply it once more on each of the terms to get [itex]6ac+4ad+3bc+2bd[/itex]. This concept can be generalized to more terms in polynomials and more polynomials as well.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K