Is There a Natural Isomorphism from V to V**?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter yifli
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Isomorphism Natural
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 2K views
yifli
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
natural isomorphism from V to V**

It is known that there is a natural isomorphism [tex]\epsilon \rightleftharpoons \omega^\epsilon[/tex] from V to V**, where [tex]\omega: V \times V* \rightarrow R[/tex] is a bilinear mapping.

So given a certain [tex]\epsilon \in V[/tex], its image under the isomorphism is actually a set of values [tex]\left\{f(\epsilon),f \in V^*\right\}[/tex], i.e., a vector is mapped to a set of numbers

Is my understanding correct?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org


yifli said:
It is known that there is a natural isomorphism [tex]\epsilon \rightleftharpoons \omega^\epsilon[/tex] from V to V**, where [tex]\omega: V \times V* \rightarrow R[/tex] is a bilinear mapping.

So given a certain [tex]\epsilon \in V[/tex], its image under the isomorphism is actually a set of values [tex]\left\{f(\epsilon),f \in V^*\right\}[/tex], i.e., a vector is mapped to a set of numbers

Is my understanding correct?

Thanks

There is no natural isomorphism between V and V*. What isomorphism are you thinking of?

Generally, any isomorphism requires the choice of an inner product where a vector in V is identified with a linear map from V into the base field. You can think of a linear map as a set of numbers but it is more than that because it is not just any map but is a linear map.
 


lavinia said:
There is no natural isomorphism between V and V*. What isomorphism are you thinking of?
it 's true that there's no natural isomorphism between V and V*, but I'm talking about the natural isomorphism between V and V**
 


yifli said:
So given a certain [tex]\epsilon \in V[/tex], its image under the isomorphism is actually a set of values [tex]\left\{f(\epsilon),f \in V^*\right\}[/tex], i.e., a vector is mapped to a set of numbers

Is my understanding correct?
Not really. The image of [itex]\epsilon[/itex] is the function that takes [itex]f \in V^*[/itex] and maps it to [itex]f(\epsilon)[/itex]. I.E. [itex]\omega^\epsilon[/itex] the function defined by
[tex]\omega^\epsilon(f) = f(\epsilon)[/tex]​

Incidentally, I assume by [itex]\omega[/itex] you mean not a general bilinear mapping, but instead the specific map [itex]\omega(x,f) = f(x)[/tex]...<br /> <br /> (Although, I could imagine what you wrote being intended to mean this, but stated awkwardly)[/itex]