Is there a non-geometic proof of this inequality

In summary, there are multiple ways to define sine and cosine and to prove their derivatives without needing the inequality sinx ≤ x ≤ tanx. These methods include using the series definition of the sin function and solving differential equations. However, if we just want the inequalities, we can integrate cosx<1 and 1<(1/cos^2 x) to derive them.
  • #1
Mu naught
208
2
sinx ≤ x ≤ tanx

You need the above inequality to prove that lim x-> 0 of sinx/x = 1, but I've only ever seen it derived geometrically. Is there an analytical proof of the above inequality, from which you can continue the sinx/x proof as normal?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
that limit is elegantly proved using the series definition of the sin function. no need for that inequality.
 
  • #3
As tauon suggests, it depends upon how you define the trig functions. You can define sine and cosine in terms of their McLaurin series (lots of fun proving periodicity from that!). You can also define "y= sin(x)" as the solution to the differential equation y"= -y with y(0)= 0, y'(0)= 1, and define "y= cos(x)" as the solution to the differential equation y"= -y with y(0)= 1, y'(0)= 0.

In either case, you don't need that inequality nor that limit to derive the derivatives of sine and cosine.
 
  • #4
(lots of fun proving periodicity from that!)
All the horrible, horrible memories. None of it even came up in the Analysis paper. If you just want the inequalities, without being too fussy about "how much we know" at this point:
Integrate cosx<1 for the first bit.
Integrate 1<(1/cos^2 x) for the second bit.

(We have to assume we know the derivatives of trig functions, and a few properties of integration. From the proofs involved, we probably know enough to do the sinx/x anyway, but...there it is if you need to check the result in an exam or something).
 
  • #5


Yes, there is a non-geometric proof of this inequality. It can be derived using the properties of trigonometric functions and the fundamental theorem of calculus. Here is a brief explanation of the proof:

First, we can use the Maclaurin series expansion of sine and tangent functions to rewrite the inequality as:

sinx ≤ x ≤ x + x^3/3

Next, using the fundamental theorem of calculus, we can show that the derivative of sinx is cosx, and the derivative of x is 1. Therefore, we can write the inequality as:

cosx ≤ 1 ≤ 1 + x^2

Now, using the fact that cosx ≤ 1 for all values of x, we can simplify the inequality to:

1 ≤ 1 + x^2

which is always true.

Therefore, we have proven that sinx ≤ x ≤ tanx using an analytical approach. This proof can then be used to continue the proof of the limit of sinx/x as x approaches 0, as you have mentioned.
 

1. Is it possible to prove an inequality without using geometric methods?

Yes, it is possible to prove an inequality using non-geometric methods. In fact, many inequalities have been proven using algebraic, analytic, or combinatorial techniques.

2. What are some examples of non-geometric proofs for inequalities?

Some examples of non-geometric proofs for inequalities include induction, Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, and the AM-GM inequality.

3. Are non-geometric proofs considered more rigorous than geometric proofs?

No, both geometric and non-geometric proofs can be equally rigorous. The validity of a proof depends on the logical reasoning and evidence presented, not the method used.

4. Why do some inequalities have both geometric and non-geometric proofs?

Some inequalities have multiple proofs because different methods may highlight different aspects of the inequality and provide a deeper understanding of why it holds.

5. How can I determine which method to use when proving an inequality?

The method used to prove an inequality depends on the specific inequality and the available tools and techniques. It is best to consider various approaches and choose the one that seems the most straightforward and appropriate for the problem at hand.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
2
Views
757
  • General Math
Replies
4
Views
832
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • General Math
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
4
Views
270
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • General Math
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top