(Is There a) Rule of Thumb for Upgrading?

  • Thread starter WWGD
  • Start date
  • #1
WWGD
Science Advisor
Gold Member
6,319
8,376
TL;DR Summary
Given so many update notices for different software, when is it a good idea to update/upgrade?
Ok, so the latest is SSMS and SQL Server notices urging me to update. Obviously the general question of when does it make sense to upgrade/update is too broad. Any tips, rules of thumb , for when it makes sense to update/upgrade?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
mathman
Science Advisor
8,100
559
Always for bug fixes. Usually for minor improvements.
 
  • Like
Likes pbuk and WWGD
  • #3
DaveC426913
Gold Member
21,452
4,928
I try to only update when I can afford the time and there's a pause in my project that depend on it.
i.e. assume the update is going to go pear-shaped and will need some baby-sitting.
 
  • Like
Likes sysprog and WWGD
  • #4
14,283
8,308
Best to update your tools between projects unless you have an issue to fix.
 
  • Like
Likes sysprog and Tom.G
  • #5
Borg
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,073
3,503
When the annoyance of not doing it becomes greater than the annoyance of doing it.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes DennisN, CalcNerd, sysprog and 4 others
  • #6
14,283
8,308
When you upgrade without much planning or experimenting things can go wrong In your project. A new an improved compiler may have deprecated some api that your program relies on heavily prompting you to rewrite those parts.

Or the new compiler has new command line flags that your build tool can’t set unless you update the build tool too.

Updates can cause a cascading effect that can derail your project and should be updated after the project is delivered And before another is started
 
  • Like
Likes Tom.G and Lnewqban
  • #7
DaveC426913
Gold Member
21,452
4,928
should be updated after the project is delivered
Unless the upgrade will improve the project sufficiently to warrant instigating it as its own phase (sprint?) .
All dev production should stop until the update is complete and regression tested.
 
  • #8
14,283
8,308
There are exceptions to every guideline.

I just wanted to point out that updates done mid project unless absolutely undeniably irrevocably needed should be deferred to the between projects time lest you affect your delivery schedule or even the delivery of the product or suite of products.

nuf said.
 
  • #9
pbuk
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
4,084
2,411
We are talking about database software here that runs independently from any project that @WWGD may be working on. Within main version streams there is no change to the API that can break anything you are working on (unless you are patching SQL Server itself, which I don't think is the case).

You should keep SQL Server updated to the latest release for your version (ie. 2012, 2014, 2016, 2017, 2019 and 2022). Consider timing for updating to the next version, bearing in mind the need to regression test whatever you are running/developing that depends on it.

SSMS can be updated to the latest version at will - if something goes wrong you can just delete it and reinstall the old version (make sure you have access to the install file for that of course).
 

Suggested for: (Is There a) Rule of Thumb for Upgrading?

  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
589
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
37
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Top