Is there a simple injection from B to A using tangent function?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a bijection between the sets A and B, where A consists of two disjoint intervals in the real numbers and B is defined by a hyperbolic equation. Participants explore the use of the tangent function and hyperbolic functions as potential tools for establishing this relationship.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants suggest isolating variables to create piecewise functions, while others propose using hyperbolic trigonometric functions for parameterization. Questions arise about the nature of bijections and whether all elements in B need to be mapped to A.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with various approaches being considered, including parameterizations and the implications of symmetry in the sets. Participants are questioning the definitions and properties of bijections, and some guidance has been offered regarding the use of hyperbolic functions.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the disjoint nature of both sets A and B, and participants are encouraged to visualize the graph of B to better understand the problem. Some participants express uncertainty about the definitions and the requirements for a function to be a bijection.

Tjaz Gantar
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Find a bijection between A and B.
Relevant Equations
A = (−∞, 0) ∪ (0, ∞) ⊂ R,
B = {(x, y) ∈ R2| x2 − y2 = 1}
So I don't really have any goods ideas on how to try and solve this. I only know that using tangent function is supposedly a good idea.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that if you isolate ##y##, you can make a piecewise injective function of ##x## that reaches all values of ##A##.
 
Tjaz Gantar said:
Homework Statement: Find a bijection between A and B.
Homework Equations: A = (−∞, 0) ∪ (0, ∞) ⊂ R,
B = {(x, y) ∈ R2| x2 − y2 = 1}

So I don't really have any goods ideas on how to try and solve this. I only know that using tangent function is supposedly a good idea.

You have ##\sec^2 t - \tan^2 t = 1## and ##\cosh^2 t - \sinh^2 t = 1##.

Either of these might be a good starting point.

Have you drawn a graph of B?
 
PeroK said:
You have ##\sec^2 t - \tan^2 t = 1## and ##\cosh^2 t - \sinh^2 t = 1##.

Either of these might be a good starting point.

Have you drawn a graph of B?
Can't we consider ##f(x) := \sqrt{x^2-1}## for ##x>1## and ##-\sqrt{x^2-1}## for ##x<-1##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
archaic said:
Can't we consider ##f(x) := \sqrt{x^2-1}## for ##x>1## and ##-\sqrt{x^2-1}## for ##x<-1##?

Okay, where are you mapping the following 4 points in B?

##x = 2, y = \sqrt{3}; \ x = 2, y = -\sqrt{3}; \ x = -2, y = \sqrt{3}; \ x = -2, y = -\sqrt{3}##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: archaic
archaic said:
Doesn't a bijection mean that the function is both injective and surjective?

Yes. I note that this is not your homework!

B is not the graph of a function.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS and archaic
Tjaz Gantar said:
Homework Statement: Find a bijection between A and B.
Homework Equations: A = (−∞, 0) ∪ (0, ∞) ⊂ R,
B = {(x, y) ∈ R2| x2 − y2 = 1}

So I don't really have any goods ideas on how to try and solve this. I only know that using tangent function is supposedly a good idea.
Hello @Tjaz Gantar .
:welcome:

I see that although you have been a member for more than half a year, this is your first post here at PF.

Please show more specifics regarding your understanding of this problem, and what you have considered in its analysis.

As @PeroK suggests, draw a graph of B.

By the way; do you mean to say x and y are squared in the definition of set B as in the following?
B = {(x, y) ∈ ℝ2| x2 − y2 = 1}​
.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
PeroK said:
Okay, where are you mapping the following 4 points in B?

##x = 2, y = \sqrt{3}; \ x = 2, y = -\sqrt{3}; \ x = -2, y = \sqrt{3}; \ x = -2, y = -\sqrt{3}##
Hey, I hope I'm not intruding on the HW further.
Isn't it irrelevant whether we map every element of the starting set if every element of the final has an antecedent? The function I gave takes all ##x##s in ##B## (##x\in\mathbb{R}-[-1,1]##) and gives you ##A##.
 
archaic said:
Hey, I hope I'm not intruding on the HW further.
Isn't it irrelevant whether we map every element of the starting set if every element of the final has an antecedent? The function I gave takes all ##x##s in ##B## (##x\in\mathbb{R}-[-1,1]##) and gives you ##A##.

I don't know what that means.
 
  • #10
archaic said:
Hey, I hope I'm not intruding on the HW further.
Isn't it irrelevant whether we map every element of the starting set if every element of the final has an antecedent? The function I gave takes all ##x##s in ##B## (##x\in\mathbb{R}-[-1,1]##) and gives you ##A##.
Yes, it's relevant. You need the map to be both one to one and onto. a bijection.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: archaic
  • #11
PeroK said:
I don't know what that means.
SammyS said:
Yes, it's relevant. You need the map to be both one to one and onto. a bijection.
I thought I remembered the definition correctly, my bad!
 
  • #12
archaic said:
I thought I remembered the definition correctly, my bad!

Take an example where ##B## is defined by ##x^2 + y^2 = 1##. Then we can define an injection from ##[0, 2\pi)## to ##B## using ##x = \cos t, \ y = \sin t##.

If ##B## were one half of a hyperbola, then the problem would be equally simple. But, ##B## is the two disjoint halves of the hyperbola. That makes things a little trickier.

But note that ##A## also is disjoint.

Another idea that may be useful is that the composition of two injections is a injection.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: archaic
  • #13
PeroK said:
Take an example where ##B## is defined by ##x^2 + y^2 = 1##. Then we can define an injection from ##[0, 2\pi)## to ##B## using ##x = \cos t, \ y = \sin t##.

If ##B## were one half of a hyperbola, then the problem would be equally simple. But, ##B## is the two disjoint halves of the hyperbola. That makes things a little trickier.

But note that ##A## also is disjoint.

Another idea that may be useful is that the composition of two injections is a injection.
Are we trying to go from ##A## to ##B##?
 
  • #14
archaic said:
Are we trying to go from ##A## to ##B##?

A bijection, by definition, goes both ways.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
archaic said:
Are we trying to go from ##A## to ##B##?
Actually, there is an injection from ##B## to ##A## which is quite remarkable. I'm not sure what the simplest way to find it is. It's the inverse of the one I found going from ##A## to ##B## starting with the hyperbolic trig parameterisation of ##B##.

It's definition is absurdly simple and looks unbelievable.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sysprog
  • #16
PeroK said:
An injection, by definition, goes both ways.
Presumably you meant to say: a bijection, by definition, goes both ways.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #17
As @PeroK pointed out earlier, if we look at the graph of the second set, we find that it is a hyperbola. So, we see hyperbola has two branches, and our set A, also has two 'branches', that is, two disjunct intervals. Also, both of these are in a sense symmetrical. Hyperbola is symmetrical with respect to ##y##-axis, while set A is symmetrical with respect to 0. So the idea could be to create parametrization of each branch of the hyperbola onto one of those intervals. By symmetry, the other branch could be parametrised trivially after this has been done. So you're searching for a function that maps positive real numbers into the positive(##x>0##) branch of the hyperbola, for example.
 
  • #18
SammyS said:
Hello @Tjaz Gantar .
:welcome:

I see that although you have been a member for more than half a year, this is your first post here at PF.

Please show more specifics regarding your understanding of this problem, and what you have considered in its analysis.

As @PeroK suggests, draw a graph of B.

By the way; do you mean to say x and y are squared in the definition of set B as in the following?
B = {(x, y) ∈ ℝ2| x2 − y2 = 1}​
.
Well I understand bijection and know what i need to do, I just had no idea how to make it so that it really is a bijection if you understand what i mean by that:D
And yes, its ment to be squared, didn't notice that it was written like that
 
  • #19
Tjaz Gantar said:
Well I understand bijection and know what i need to do, I just had no idea how to make it so that it really is a bijection if you understand what i mean by that:D
And yes, its ment to be squared, didn't notice that it was written like that

I don't know if there is an easier way to get a solution, but what I did was:

Start with the parameterisation of ##B## using the hyperbolic trig functions. Then, remember that the composition of two bijections is a bijection.
 
  • #20
Antarres said:
As @PeroK pointed out earlier, if we look at the graph of the second set, we find that it is a hyperbola. So, we see hyperbola has two branches, and our set A, also has two 'branches', that is, two disjunct intervals. Also, both of these are in a sense symmetrical. Hyperbola is symmetrical with respect to ##y##-axis, while set A is symmetrical with respect to 0. So the idea could be to create parametrization of each branch of the hyperbola onto one of those intervals. By symmetry, the other branch could be parametrised trivially after this has been done. So you're searching for a function that maps positive real numbers into the positive(##x>0##) branch of the hyperbola, for example.
So if i make it
x=t (t being element of A), y=|√(x2 - 1)| for t≥1
and
y=tan(π(t-1)/2), x=|√(y2+1)| for 0<t<1
would that be okay from "the right part" of A to "the right part" of the hyperbola?
 
  • #21
Tjaz Gantar said:
So if i make it
x=t (t being element of A), y=|√(x2 - 1)| for t≥1
and
y=tan(π(t-1)/2), x=|√(y2+1)| for 0<t<1
would that be okay from "the right part" of A to "the right part" of the hyperbola?

Yes, that looks right.

Note that ##\sqrt{x}## is non-negative, by definition.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tjaz Gantar
  • #22
PeroK said:
Yes, that looks right.
okay its nice to see progress in my head hah thanks
 
  • #23
In theory we can also use Schroeder Bernstein and produce injections from each set to the other. Not likely but it may have been used in the class without proof.
 
  • #24
PeroK said:
Actually, there is an injection from ##B## to ##A## which is quite remarkable. I'm not sure what the simplest way to find it is. It's the inverse of the one I found going from ##A## to ##B## starting with the hyperbolic trig parameterisation of ##B##.

It's definition is absurdly simple and looks unbelievable.
Is this that injection from ##B## to ##A##
##f(x,y)=x+y##
?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K