Is there a smallest point in the interval [0,1] where f attains the value of 0?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the existence of a smallest point \( X_0 \) in the interval [0,1] where the continuous function \( f: [0,1] \to \mathbb{R} \) attains the value of 0, given that \( f(0) > 0 \) and \( f(1) = 0 \). It is established that there exists a sequence \( X_n \) converging to \( X_0 \) such that \( f(X_n) \) converges to \( f(X_0) \). Two alternative approaches are suggested for the proof: analyzing the topological structure of the set \( f^{-1}(\{0\}) \) and considering the implications if this set lacked a smallest element within the interval.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of continuous functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concept of limits and convergence in real analysis
  • Basic knowledge of topology, particularly regarding sets and their properties
  • Experience with proof techniques in mathematical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of continuous functions in real analysis
  • Learn about the topology of sets and their implications in analysis
  • Explore the concept of limit points and sequences in metric spaces
  • Investigate proof techniques for existence theorems in analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis or topology, as well as educators seeking to deepen their understanding of continuity and limit concepts in mathematical proofs.

cxc001
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Suppose f:[0,1]->R is continuous, f(0)>0, f(1)=0.
Prove that there is a X0 in (0,1] such that f(Xo)=0 & f(X) >0 for 0<=X<Xo (there is a smallest point in the interval [0,1] which f attains 0)

Since f is continuous, then there exist a sequence Xn converges to X0, and f(Xn) converges to f(Xo).
Since 0<=(Xo-1/n)<Xo
Can I just let Xn=Xo-1/n so that 0<=Xn<Xo
So when Xn->Xo, f(Xn)->f(Xo)

I wasn't convinced enough this is the right approach...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, this won't work, because you begin by assuming the existence of the number x_0, which existence you are required to prove.

I suggest two other approaches, either of which will work.

1. What does the set f^{-1}(\{0\}) look like, topologically?

2. What would happen if the set of points x such that f(x) = 0 had no smallest element in [0,1]?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K