Is there a theoretical upper bound for density?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the theoretical upper bound for the density of matter, exploring whether it is possible to compress matter to extreme densities, including the implications of degeneracy pressures and singularities in black holes. Participants examine the relationship between energy, density, and the limits of current physical theories.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether there is a theoretical upper bound for the density of matter, suggesting that compression may be limited by the finite energy of the universe.
  • Others propose that density might be compressible to zero volume, citing concepts like electron and neutron degeneracy and the limits imposed by gravity.
  • A participant references the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff limit for neutron-degenerate objects, noting that the precise limit is unknown and depends on poorly understood equations of state.
  • There is a discussion about the breakdown of current scientific understanding at extreme densities, such as those found in black hole singularities and during the big bang.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the concept of infinite density, arguing that density must be finite and that division by zero leads to undefined results.
  • Another participant emphasizes that practical considerations, such as the amount of energy available, do not negate theoretical inquiries into density limits.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether there is a theoretical upper bound for density, with multiple competing views and uncertainties expressed throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in current models of physics, particularly regarding the behavior of matter under extreme conditions and the implications of infinite density.

pilpel
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Is there a theoretical upper bound for the density of matter? Given a proton (already almost as dense as a black hole, according to Wikipedia), can you theoretically compress it into any non-zero volume? Has any work been done that shows that matter can or cannot achieve certain levels of density?

Thank you,
pilpel
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pilpel said:
Is there a theoretical upper bound for the density of matter? Given a proton (already almost as dense as a black hole, according to Wikipedia), can you theoretically compress it into any non-zero volume?

No. Compression requires energy and so far as we know energy of Universe is finite.
 
short answer: nobody really knows, but maybe density can even be compressed to zero volume!

We know about electron degeneracy and neutron degeneracy and can compute how much gravity is required to achieve them... In the latter, things are so dense that protons and electrons are crushed together forming neutrons...

Wikipedia says:

There is an upper limit to the mass of a neutron-degenerate object, the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff limit, which is analogous to the Chandrasekhar limit for electron-degenerate objects. The precise limit is unknown, as it depends on the equations of state of nuclear matter, for which a highly accurate model is not yet available...Whether quark-degenerate matter forms at all in these situations depends on the equations of state of both neutron-degenerate matter and quark-degenerate matter, both of which are poorly known.
...

Singularity

At densities greater than those supported by any degeneracy, gravity overwhelms all other forces. To the best of our current understanding, the body collapses to form a black hole. In the frame of reference that is co-moving with the collapsing matter, all the matter ends up in an infinitely dense singularity at the center of the event horizon. In the frame of reference of an observer at infinity, the collapse asymptotically approaches the event horizon
QUOTE]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_degeneracy_pressure

Our science seems to begin the break down at just beyond neutron degeneracy...and generally quantum mechanics and general relativity fail to show exactly what is present at the big bang and at black hole singularities... equations diverge there, leading to apparent infinities, but I think most physicsts think that's a result of inadequate models rather than a reflection of actual infinities.

Anyway, if a bound is found, likely it will be at the big bang or black hole singularities.
 
Last edited:
juanrga,

Good point, but the amount of energy in the universe is a practical consideration, not a theoretical one. My question may be restated as "given an arbitrarily large amount of energy, does density have an upper bound?"

Naty1,

I must admit that I could never understand the notion of infinite density. Even at the conceptual or theoretical level it makes no sense to me. Since density is mass divided by volume, it must be finite. If the denominator is zero, then the fraction is simply undefined, not infinite. And that doesn't even take into the consideration the non-intuitive if not absurd notion of zero volume that contains non-zero mass.
 
pilpel said:
juanrga,

Good point, but the amount of energy in the universe is a practical consideration, not a theoretical one. My question may be restated as "given an arbitrarily large amount of energy, does density have an upper bound?"

There is nothing more practical than a good theory. If the amount of energy is arbitrarily large but finite, the response is the same than before: no.

If the amount is infinite, then you get into trouble because theories break down when starting to consider infinities and you cannot answer the question if your theory does not work.

As you know division by zero is not defined in math; therefore, how do you wait a physical theory to deal with such stuff as ρ=N/0 :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
16K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
9K