Is There a Trick to Solve x^x^x^x^x...=10?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter starfish99
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the infinite exponentiation sequence defined as x, x^x, x^x^x, and so forth, as explored by Peter Winkler. It is established that the sequence converges for x values less than or equal to e^(1/e) or approximately 1.44467, with divergence occurring for larger x values. The equation x^x^x^x^x...=2 can be solved using the trick of equating the exponent to the entire expression, yielding x=sqrt(2). However, this method fails for the equation x^x^x^x^x...=10, as no x exists that allows the sequence to converge to 10, highlighting the limitations of the trick when applied to larger values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of infinite sequences and limits
  • Familiarity with the mathematical constant e (approximately 2.71828)
  • Knowledge of exponentiation and its properties
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the mathematical constant e and its applications in sequences
  • Explore the concept of convergence and divergence in infinite sequences
  • Learn about fixed-point equations and their solutions in mathematical analysis
  • Investigate other examples of infinite exponentiation and their convergence criteria
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, and students interested in advanced mathematical concepts, particularly those exploring infinite sequences and convergence properties.

starfish99
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
In a book of math puzzles Peter Winkler discusses the sequence x, x^x, x^x^x, x^x^x^x and writes about conditions for its divergence. Clearly for x=1 the sequence is 1,and for x=2 it diverges to infinity.

Then he shows that the maximum value of x for the sequence to converge is x=e^(1/e) or
x= 1.44467... At this value the infinite tower of "x" exponents is equal to e (2.7182818..).
For any x larger than e^(1/e), the sequence diverges to infinity.

Mr Winkler later goes on to discuss the equation x^x^x^x^x...=2 (an infinite tower of "x"
exponents=2)
By using the trick that the exponent of the bottom"x" is the same as the whole expression,the equation becomes x^2=2, and x=sqrt(2)=1.414... is the solution.
(This is close to the maximum value for convegence( shown above) 1.44467...

My question(finally):
Suppose you have an equation x^x^x^x^x^x^x...=10 (an infinite tower of "x"=10)
Why can't you use the same trick as we did for x^x^x^x^x^x=2 case.
In this case we would get x^10=10. And the solution is x= the tenth root of 10(x=1.2589..)
Now the tenth root of 10 is clearly the wrong answer because:
1) It is too small . It is smaller than sqrt(2) whose tower conveges to the number 2
2) The maximum value this tower of "x" converges to is 2.71828... at x=e^(1/e)

Why doesn't this trick work for x^x^x^x^x^x...=10 ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Because there is no x for which the sequence converges to 10? The trick works for small x because we presume that the solution exists, which is not the case here.
 


Thanks hamster. Sometimes you can forget, some equations have no solutions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K