Is There a Way to Reverse Substitution in Finding Zeroes?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pierce15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Substitution
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of finding zeroes of complex functions, specifically examining the relationship between the functions f(z)=e^z, g(z)=z, and h(z)=ln(z). Participants explore the implications of substitutions made during this process and whether a "reverse substitution" can be applied to transition back from one function to another.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the process of substitution in finding zeroes, particularly questioning the feasibility of reversing a substitution made from h(z) to i(z).
  • Another participant asserts that the assumption of z being a real number leads to contradictions, as there is no real solution to e^z = z.
  • Some participants note that the discussion is framed within the context of complex functions, emphasizing the need to consider this aspect in the analysis.
  • References are made to the Lambert W function, suggesting its relevance to the problem at hand.
  • A later post clarifies the problem statement, indicating a desire to prove that the systems of equations involving f(z) and g(z) share the same solutions as those involving f(z) and h(z).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the feasibility of reversing the substitution or the implications of their assumptions. Multiple viewpoints are presented regarding the nature of the functions and the existence of solutions.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the nature of z (real vs. complex) and the implications of the substitutions made. The relationship between the functions and the Lambert W function is noted but not fully explored.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in complex analysis, the properties of exponential functions, and the Lambert W function may find this discussion relevant.

pierce15
Messages
313
Reaction score
2
Hi guys... I'm probably missing something pretty basic here but I can't seem to figure this out. I was working on a problem recently: for the complex functions f(z)=ez and g(z)=z, find their intersections. This post is not about the problem, it is about something I noticed while tackling it (incorrectly).

Anyways, here's what I noticed: If you set these functions equal to each other, you get

ez=z

So, naturally:

z=ln(z)

From here I saw that a basic substitution was applicable, so the equation can be rewritten:

ez=ln(z)

Basically, what I have shown is that the function h(z)=ez-z has the same zeroes as the function i(z)=ez-ln(z). Now here's what's troubling me: what if the original problem that I gave you was to find the zeroes of i(z)? Originally, we obtained i(z) from h(z) by using a substitution, but is there some way that we can go in reverse from i(z) to h(z) using a "reverse substitution"? I'm sorry if this is rather unclear. Is there anything fundamental that I am missing?

Thanks a lot
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can do, pretty much any whacky thing you want because everything you do starts from the assumption that z is a real number such that [itex]e^z= z[/itex] and there is NO such number.
 
HallsofIvy said:
You can do, pretty much any whacky thing you want because everything you do starts from the assumption that z is a real number such that [itex]e^z= z[/itex] and there is NO such number.

Note that we are working with complex functions. By the way, I did find an answer to this problem, right now I am just thinking about reversing the substitution
 
pwsnafu said:
This is related to the Lambert W function.

pwnsnafu, like I said, I already solved the equation using the labert w function. Please read my first post carefully.
 
I guess this is kind of unclear. Here is the problem stated more clearly:

Prove that the system of f(z)=ez and g(z)=ln(z) has the same solutions as the system of f(z)=ez and h(z)=z
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K