Is there a way to translate a particle's spin into regular motion?

In summary, there is no known mechanism that can differentiate between two values of given spin, say up or down, and subsequently, "translate," that either value of spin into a corresponding direction in motion.
  • #1
Vanilla Gorilla
78
24
TL;DR Summary
Is there a way to translate a particle's spin into regular motion?
Is there a way to translate a quantum particle's spin into regular motion in any of the directions?
 
  • Like
Likes Alex Ford
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Sort of. You can annihilate a particle with its anti particle. The resulting particles can have a large KE. But it isn’t exactly just converting its spin into KE, it is converting everything into other stuff including additional KE
 
  • #3
Are there any other known mechanisms?
 
  • #4
No. You cannot separate a particle’s spin from the particle itself. It is part of what makes the particle what it is. All you can do is change it into a different particle by annihilation or other decay.
 
  • #5
Ok, thank you for the help :)
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #6
Maybe I misunderstand the orginal question, but isn't this precisely what the Stern-Gerlach experiment is about? Running through an inhomogeneous magnetic field the particle is deflected depending on the spin projection (magnetic moment) in direction of this magnetic field, i.e., you get an entanglement between this spin component and the particle's momentum and/or position.
 
  • Like
Likes Dale
  • #7
The spin is the same before and after so spin is not converted into linear motion.
 
  • #8
In an SG the spin is not necessarily the same, it's precessing around the magnetic field, and that's the dynamical reason, why the SGE sorts particles according to the values ##\pm \hbar/2## of the spin component in direction of the magnetic field.

Of course it's not "converted" into linear motion. As I said, maybe I haven't understood the question right.
 
  • #9
My understanding is that he wants to take a spin 1 particle at rest and make it into a spin 1/2 or a spin 0 particle with linear momentum. Like dropping a spinning tire onto a road and letting it convert angular momentum into linear momentum. The difference is that the tire is still the same tire if you change its spin, but if you change a particle's spin it is no longer the same particle.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #10
I think I phrased the question somewhat poorly. My bad. What I meant to ask was whether or not there is a known mechanism that could differentiate between two values of given spin, say up or down, and subsequently, "translate," that either value of spin into a corresponding direction in motion.
 
  • #11
Please try to be more courteous in the future. I wasted my time responding to you because you failed to write a clear question in the beginning. Please ignore all of my comments here since I misunderstood what you asked and nothing that I have said is relevant to your actual question. If you had written a three line question instead of a one line question then I could have answered it immediately.

The answer to your clarified question is yes. The Stern-Gerlatch experiment mentioned by Vanhees is an example.

Edit: looking back, I see that it was not purely a miscommunication on your side, but also a misreading on my side. I read "convert" instead of "translate". In any case, a more clear question would have been appreciated.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #12
vanhees71 said:
Maybe I misunderstand the orginal question
Nope, it was me who misunderstood.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #13
My bad, I'm sorry. Not an excuse, but I'm new, so that's probably why I'm not good at writing these yet.
 
  • Like
Likes eloheim and Dale
  • #14
Vanilla Gorilla said:
I think I phrased the question somewhat poorly. My bad. What I meant to ask was whether or not there is a known mechanism that could differentiate between two values of given spin, say up or down, and subsequently, "translate," that either value of spin into a corresponding direction in motion.
That would be the famous Stern-Gerlach experiment, as described in post #6.
 
  • #15
Ok, thank you all for your aid! In addition, I am deeply apologetic for any distress I may have caused.
 
  • #16
Is there a way to do the reverse?
 
  • #17
Vanilla Gorilla said:
Is there a way to do the reverse?

Meaning, reverse a Stern-Gerlach experiment? In principle, yes, it would be possible, but the practical difficulties would be very great. You would have to redirect both output beams from one Stern-Gerlach device back into a second device in such a way that they recombined.

Doing the equivalent operations with photon polarizations is much easier; that's basically what a simple Mach-Zehnder interferometer does (it splits a photon at one beam splitter and recombines it at a second beam splitter after reflecting off a mirror in each arm).
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #19
And polarization can be affected by the principles behind quantum entanglement, yes? Also, just for confirmation, this Mach-Zehnder interferometer would be able to convert momentum into polarization?

In addition, unrelated question, but I'm curious if all particles are waves as well, does that mean all particles have polarizations?

And separately, reversing the mechanism that could differentiate between two values of given spin, say up or down, and subsequently, "translate," that either value of spin into a corresponding direction in motion?
 
Last edited:
  • #20
Vanilla Gorilla said:
this Mach-Zehnder interferometer would be able to convert momentum into polarization?

The term "convert" is not a good term to use to describe what devices like beam splitters and polarizers (for photons) and Stern Gerlach magnets (for electrons) do. They don't "convert" linear momentum into polarization/spin, or vice versa; the magnitude of both the linear momentum and the spin of the particle is the same after going through the device as before.

What they do is (possibly) redirect the momentum of the particle based on its polarization/spin. For example, a Stern-Gerlach magnet, when used normally, bends the path of an electron one way for spin up and the other way for spin down. (In a "reverse" usage, the magnet would have to be taking in two beams, one for spin up and one for spin down, and bending each one so that they come out in just one beam.)

A Mach-Zehnder interferometer actually doesn't care about the polarization of the photons (since it uses simple beam splitters that are insensitive to polarization). It just splits (or recombines) photon beams. But there are more complicated quantum optics devices that are sensitive to polarization.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Vanilla Gorilla
  • #21
By bends the electron, I'm assuming you mean that it would just accelerate the electron one way for one spin value, and a correspondingly opposite way for the opposite spin value?
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #22
Vanilla Gorilla said:
By bends the electron, I'm assuming you mean that it would just accelerate the electron one way for one spin value, and a correspondingly opposite way for the opposite spin value?

That's what a Stern-Gerlach device does, yes: it has an inhomogeneous magnetic field that splits the input beam into two output beams, one for spin up and one for spin down.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #23
Alright, thank you!
 
  • #24
And the reverse process "translates" (Sorry, can't think of a better term) direction of momentum into spin?
 
  • #25
Vanilla Gorilla said:
And the reverse process "translates" (Sorry, can't think of a better term) direction of momentum into spin?

No. I already explained what it does do: it recombines two input beams into one output beam, assuming the two input beams have opposite spin values (one is spin up and one is spin down) because they were produced by a previous Stern-Gerlach device operating in the "forward" direction.
 
  • #26
@Vanilla Gorilla,

Please re-read this from one of my previous posts:

PeterDonis said:
the magnitude of both the linear momentum and the spin of the particle is the same after going through the device as before

It is very important to keep this in mind as you think about what these devices do.
 
  • #27
So the reverse process not have anything to do w/ momentum? I'm really sorry if I'm missing something
 
  • #28
Vanilla Gorilla said:
So the reverse process not have anything to do w/ momentum?

It combines two beams into one, which means it affects the direction of the momentum of the beams. It does not affect the magnitude of the momentum of the beams. It also does not affect the spins themselves, although it does affect the correlation between the momentum and the spins.
 
  • #29
Just to clarify before I write something up, @Vanilla Gorilla it seems to me that your questions are basically the following:

Your first one is: By ONLY knowing the particle's spin, can I map out its' equation of motion?
Your second one is: Since I measured the particles spin, is it possible to know its' equation of motions before the measurement took place?
 
  • #30
Vanilla Gorilla said:
Is there a way to do the reverse?

Yes, the experiment was reported on by:
Explicit experimental verification of quantum spin-state superposition
J. Summhammer, G. Badurek, H. Rauch, U. Kischko
Physics Letters A Volume 90, Issue 3, 28 June 1982, Pages 110-112
https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(82)90709-5
"... In 1963 Wigner [1] proposed a Gedankenexperiment where he imagined a double Stern—Gerlach arrangement to separate and subsequently recombine coherently the z-spin components of an x-spin particle. Zeilinger [2] suggested the realization of such an experiment by means of neutron interferometry. The detailed theoretical framework by means of which the measured results can be interpreted conveniently is treated by Eder and Zeilinger [3]. In this letter we report on an experiment with polarized neutrons that was performed at the perfect crystal neutron interferometer setup (Dl8) at Grenoble [4]. ..."

The experiment is discussed by Ballentine in his notorious Quantum Mechanics book. In the 1998 edition, it is referenced in Chapter 9, p243. Unfortunately, Balletine's book is especially flawed and tainted by his eccentric personal views in that chapter, so reader beware!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Lord Jestocost
  • #31
Vanilla Gorilla said:
And polarization can be affected by the principles behind quantum entanglement, yes? Also, just for confirmation, this Mach-Zehnder interferometer would be able to convert momentum into polarization?

In addition, unrelated question, but I'm curious if all particles are waves as well, does that mean all particles have polarizations?

And separately, reversing the mechanism that could differentiate between two values of given spin, say up or down, and subsequently, "translate," that either value of spin into a corresponding direction in motion?
It's very confusing to say "convert momentum into polarization". What happens in a Stern-Gerlach experiment for spin and with polarizing beam splitters is that you entangle the polarization with the momentum of the particle. Take, e.g., some birefringent crystal as a polarizing beam splitter. It can be described with classical physics: Due to the anisotropic dielectric tensor the refraction index is different for horizontal and vertical polarized field modes and thus the refraction angle for these two polarization modes is different, which means that an arbitrarily polarized beam gets split into one beam horizontally and the other vertically polarized, i.e., the momentum (direction) is entangled with the polarization. Using single photons in arbitrary polarization it gets randomly refracted in the one or the other direction with probabilities weighted as the intensity of the corresponding classical em. waves, i.e., the single photon behind the beam splitter is in a state where the polarization is entangled with its momentum. The entire description of a lossless (idealized) polarizing beam splitter is given by some unitary operator.
 
  • #32
atyy said:
The experiment is discussed by Ballentine in his notorious Quantum Mechanics book. In the 1998 edition, it is referenced in Chapter 9, p243. Unfortunately, Balletine's book is especially flawed and tainted by his eccentric personal views in that chapter, so reader beware!
To the contrary, Ballentine's book is one of the few that is not spoiled by the notorious collapse doctrine, but that's interpretation and belongs to the corresponding subforum!
 
  • Haha
Likes atyy
  • #33
Can particles like electrons have polarization, since they are also waves?
 
  • #34
Vanilla Gorilla said:
Can particles like electrons have polarization, since they are also waves?

In quantum mechanics, "polarization" is just another term for spin, applied to massless particles like photons. It has nothing to do with waves.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and PeroK
  • #35
Yes, but also massive particles (or rather ensembles of massive particles) can be polarized. E.g., at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider there are experiments with polarized protons to investigate their spin properties (generalized parton-distribution functions etc.).
 
<H2>1. What is particle spin and how is it related to regular motion?</H2><p>Particle spin is an intrinsic property of subatomic particles that describes their angular momentum. It is related to regular motion because the spin of a particle can affect how it behaves in a magnetic field, which can in turn influence its motion.</p><H2>2. Is it possible to translate a particle's spin into regular motion?</H2><p>Yes, it is possible to use the spin of a particle to manipulate its motion. This is known as spin manipulation and is a key concept in quantum computing and other advanced technologies.</p><H2>3. How do scientists measure a particle's spin?</H2><p>There are several methods for measuring a particle's spin, including using magnetic fields, observing the particle's interactions with other particles, and using specialized equipment such as spin polarimeters.</p><H2>4. Can the direction of a particle's spin be changed?</H2><p>Yes, the direction of a particle's spin can be changed through various methods, such as applying a magnetic field or using specialized equipment to manipulate the particle's spin state.</p><H2>5. What applications does understanding particle spin have in technology?</H2><p>Understanding particle spin has many applications in technology, including in quantum computing, magnetic storage devices, and medical imaging techniques such as MRI. It also has potential uses in developing new materials and technologies for energy storage and transmission.</p>

1. What is particle spin and how is it related to regular motion?

Particle spin is an intrinsic property of subatomic particles that describes their angular momentum. It is related to regular motion because the spin of a particle can affect how it behaves in a magnetic field, which can in turn influence its motion.

2. Is it possible to translate a particle's spin into regular motion?

Yes, it is possible to use the spin of a particle to manipulate its motion. This is known as spin manipulation and is a key concept in quantum computing and other advanced technologies.

3. How do scientists measure a particle's spin?

There are several methods for measuring a particle's spin, including using magnetic fields, observing the particle's interactions with other particles, and using specialized equipment such as spin polarimeters.

4. Can the direction of a particle's spin be changed?

Yes, the direction of a particle's spin can be changed through various methods, such as applying a magnetic field or using specialized equipment to manipulate the particle's spin state.

5. What applications does understanding particle spin have in technology?

Understanding particle spin has many applications in technology, including in quantum computing, magnetic storage devices, and medical imaging techniques such as MRI. It also has potential uses in developing new materials and technologies for energy storage and transmission.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
858
Replies
2
Views
907
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
731
Replies
12
Views
907
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
48
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
815
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
704
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
22
Views
2K
Back
Top