Is there an absolute maximum value of this function?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function f: R² -> R defined by f(x,y) = e^(x+y) - y + x is analyzed for its absolute maximum on the set s = {(x,y) : |x| + |y| <= 2}. The discussion confirms that the set s is both bounded and closed, thus compact. By applying the Extreme Value Theorem (EVT), it is established that f has an absolute maximum on s. The challenge arises in determining the boundary of s, which can be approached by considering the geometric representation of the set as a diamond shape in the Cartesian plane.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of continuous functions in multivariable calculus
  • Familiarity with the Extreme Value Theorem (EVT)
  • Knowledge of compact sets in topology
  • Basic skills in geometric interpretation of inequalities
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of continuous functions on compact sets
  • Learn about the geometric representation of inequalities in R²
  • Explore examples of applying the Extreme Value Theorem in multivariable contexts
  • Investigate methods for finding boundaries of sets defined by absolute values
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, particularly those focusing on multivariable functions and optimization problems, as well as mathematicians interested in the application of the Extreme Value Theorem.

pantin
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the function f:R^2->R defined by f(x,y)=[e^(x+y)]-y+x. Is there an absolute maximum value of f on the set s={(x,y):/x/+/y/<=2}? Justify.

note, /x/ is the absolute value of x.

Homework Equations



a. If f is con't, it takes compact sets to compact sets.

b.Extreme value thm: Suppose s belongs to R^n is compact and f: s->R is continuous. then f has an absolute min value and an absolute max value on S


The Attempt at a Solution




My idea is
=>show s is bounded and closed => therefore compact => f con't maps compact sets to compact sets => EVT

but I encounted problem when finding boundary of s
/x/+/y/<=2 that means /x/<=2 when y=0 and /y/<=2 when x=0. then can I find the boundary here by constructing a circle with x and y? because I saw other example did it on this way.
Help..
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K