Is there an analytical solution to the following problem?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around solving a 1D transient heat diffusion problem represented by the differential equation \(\frac{{\partial}^2 T (x,t)}{\partial x^2} = \frac{1}{\alpha}\frac{\partial T(x,t)}{\partial t}\) with specific boundary conditions. The participants explore the use of the Laplace transform to derive the temperature distribution \(T(x,t)\) and discuss the steady state solution \(T(x,\infty)\). Key parameters include thermal conductivity \(k\), heat capacity \(c_p\), and density \(\rho\), with \(\alpha\) defined as \(\frac{k}{c_p \rho}\). The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying boundary conditions and the need for clarity in defining constants such as \(T_{\max}\) and \(T_{\infty}\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial differential equations, specifically heat diffusion equations.
  • Familiarity with Laplace transforms and their application in solving differential equations.
  • Knowledge of boundary and initial conditions in the context of heat transfer problems.
  • Basic concepts of thermal properties, including thermal conductivity, heat capacity, and density.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Laplace transforms in solving partial differential equations.
  • Research steady state solutions in heat transfer problems and their mathematical proofs.
  • Explore numerical methods for solving transient heat diffusion problems.
  • Investigate the physical implications of boundary conditions in thermal analysis.
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and students involved in thermal analysis, heat transfer modeling, and those seeking to deepen their understanding of transient heat diffusion problems.

deepakphysics
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Differential equation
\begin{align}
\frac{{\partial}^2 T (x,t)}{\partial x^2} = \frac{1}{\alpha}\frac{\partial T(x,t)}{\partial t},
\end{align}

boundary conditions
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
T(x, 0) = T_\infty \\
-k\frac{\partial T(0,t)}{\partial x}= h(T_{max} - T(0,t)) \\
-k\frac{\partial T(l,t)}{\partial x}= h(T(l,t) - T_\infty).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}

It is 1D transient heat diffusion problem. x[0,L] represents a 1D spatial domain and t[0,tao] represents a time domain. T(x,t) is temperature distribution over the spatial and temporal domain. \alpha = k/(cp*rho), where k is thermal conductivity, cp heat capacity and \rho thermal conductivity.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
what is ##T_{\max}##
 
T_max is a constant value. T_infinity is also a constant value.
 
Last edited:
then try to use the Laplace transform in the variable t
 
Yes doing that we will arrive at solution T(x,t) = (A*cos(w*x)+Bsin(w*x))*T_inf*e^(-alpha*w^2*t).
I have problem now finding values of A, B and W with given boundary conditions.
 
I have got the following Laplace transform
$$\hat T(x,p)=\frac{T_\infty}{p}+C_1e^{x\sqrt{p/\alpha}}+C_2e^{-x\sqrt{p/\alpha}}$$
then we have two equations:
$$k\hat T_x(0,p)=\frac{hT_\max}{p}-h\hat T(0,p),\quad k\hat T_x(l,p)=h\hat T(l,p)-\frac{h T_\infty}{p}$$ and two unknown functions ##C_j=C_j(p),\quad j=1,2## I do not see what is the problem
 
Last edited:
Thank you for the solution. It is possible to find C1 and C2. I got as follows (picture attached) a = alpha Tm = T_max, Ti = T_inf. I am stuck again..how can we find inverse laplace ?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-05-21 at 19.25.51.png
    Screen Shot 2016-05-21 at 19.25.51.png
    33 KB · Views: 578
There is a much easier way of solving this problem analytically. The first step is to solve for the steady state solution. What do you get for the steady state solution?

Chet
 
Hi
I have following analytical solution (Please find it in the attachment). T1 and T2 are temperature at the surface of inner and outer wall.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-06-05 at 00.17.44.png
    Screen Shot 2016-06-05 at 00.17.44.png
    35.4 KB · Views: 683
  • Screen Shot 2016-06-05 at 00.16.59.png
    Screen Shot 2016-06-05 at 00.16.59.png
    9 KB · Views: 651
  • #10
deepakphysics said:
Hi
I have following analytical solution (Please find it in the attachment). T1 and T2 are temperature at the surface of inner and outer wall.
OK. Let ##T(x,\infty)## represent this final steady state solution. Now express the temperature at an arbitrary time t as follows:
$$T(x,t)=T(x,\infty)-\theta (x,t)$$
Now, if you substitute this into the differential equation, boundary conditions and initial conditions, what do you get (in terms of ##\theta##)?
 
  • #11
This is what I got. One more thing, T_infty is not the temperature corresponding to steady state solution. It is a ambient temperature. For some reason it should be taken as a variable. The results need to be expressed in terms of T_infty and T_max and other material parameters (h, l, k ).
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-06-05 at 11.39.38.png
    Screen Shot 2016-06-05 at 11.39.38.png
    54.6 KB · Views: 652
  • #12
deepakphysics said:
This is what I got. One more thing, T_infty is not the temperature corresponding to steady state solution. It is a ambient temperature. For some reason it should be taken as a variable. The results need to be expressed in terms of T_infty and T_max and other material parameters (h, l, k ).
I understand all this. Now please answer my question in the previous post.
 
  • #13
Thank you. I have tried to answer your question. I have attached a screen shot in the previous reply (forgot to mention about the attached screen shot).
 
  • #14
deepakphysics said:
Thank you. I have tried to answer your question. I have attached a screen shot in the previous reply (forgot to mention about the attached screen shot).
Oh, sorry. I missed that.

There is a mistake in your equation for ##T(x,\infty)##. The x should be an x/l. Please make this correction in your initial condition and boundary conditions, and also reduce these equations to a common denominator.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: deepakphysics
  • #15
Thank you for the correction. Please find the updated results in the attachments.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-06-05 at 17.09.46.png
    Screen Shot 2016-06-05 at 17.09.46.png
    65.2 KB · Views: 655
  • #16
deepakphysics said:
Thank you for the correction. Please find the updated results in the attachments.
My solution for ##T(x,/infty)## does not match yours. Based on the boundary condition equations you gave in your first post, I get:
$$T(x,\infty)=\frac{-T_{max}+\beta (T_{max}+T_{\infty})+(T_{max}-T_{\infty})x/l}{(2\beta -1)}$$
Note the minus sign in the denominator. Try this and see if it satisfies you boundary conditions.

I suggest that, when you do the formulation in terms of ##\theta##, you continue to use ##\beta## in the equations.
 
  • #17
I think I did little mistake in the first post. There should have been a minus sign in the left hand side of both equations representing spatial boundary conditions. Also I did mistake in my previous reply. I think I have corrected those mistake this time. Please find the outcome in the attachments I) in terms of \beta and ii) interms of (k,h and l).
 

Attachments

  • transientsteady.PNG
    transientsteady.PNG
    45.6 KB · Views: 528
  • transientsteadynobeta.PNG
    transientsteadynobeta.PNG
    47.2 KB · Views: 583
  • #18
Chestermiller said:
There is a much easier way of solving this problem analytically. The first step is to solve for the steady state solution. What do you get for the steady state solution?

Chet
We can prove mathematically that the steady state solution exists? That is if ##T(x,t)## is a function that satisfies (1) then the limit ##\lim_{t \to \infty}T(x,t)=f(x)## exists and it is finite?

OR we assume that it exists because we have to do with a physical process that will reach in some sort of equilibrium and that nothing can become infinite in a physical process?
 
  • #19
deepakphysics said:
I think I did little mistake in the first post. There should have been a minus sign in the left hand side of both equations representing spatial boundary conditions.
Yes. I missed this. I'm editing your original post to correct this.
Also I did mistake in my previous reply. I think I have corrected those mistake this time. Please find the outcome in the attachments I) in terms of \beta and ii) interms of (k,h and l).
I'll check it out in a little while.
 
  • #20
Delta² said:
We can prove mathematically that the steady state solution exists? That is if ##T(x,t)## is a function that satisfies (1) then the limit ##\lim_{t \to \infty}T(x,t)=f(x)## exists and it is finite?

OR we assume that it exists because we have to do with a physical process that will reach in some sort of equilibrium and that nothing can become infinite in a physical process?
I'm not a mathematician so I couldn't answer whether it can be proven mathematically that there is a stable steady state solution. I let the physics of the situation tell me this, based on an abundance of heat transfer experience. This problem obviously involves convective heat transfer at the two ends of the rod, with the external temperatures being Tmax and T.
 
  • #21
deepakphysics said:
I think I did little mistake in the first post. There should have been a minus sign in the left hand side of both equations representing spatial boundary conditions. Also I did mistake in my previous reply. I think I have corrected those mistake this time. Please find the outcome in the attachments I) in terms of \beta and ii) interms of (k,h and l).
I couldn't read what you had, but here's what I got (for the corrected boundary conditions):
$$T(x,\infty)=\frac{T_{max}+\beta (T_{max}+T_{\infty})-(T_{max}-T_{\infty})x/l}{(1+2\beta)}$$

Initial condition: $$\theta (x,0)=\frac{(T_{max}-T_{\infty})(\beta + x/l)}{(1+2\beta)}$$

Boundary condition at x = 0:$$\frac{\partial \theta}{\partial (x/l)}=\frac{\theta}{\beta}$$

Boundary condition at (x/l) = 1:$$\frac{\partial \theta}{\partial (x/l)}=-\frac{\theta}{\beta}$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
955
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K