Is there an easier way to find this limit rigorously?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FaroukYasser
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on evaluating the limit of the expression lim (sqrt(n+c) + d) / (n^(2/3) * (1 + a/n + b/n^2)^(1/3)) as n approaches infinity. The Sandwich Theorem is referenced as a method for proving that the limit equals zero. A more efficient approach is suggested, involving rewriting the numerator and denominator in terms of n to simplify the limit calculation. The discussion confirms that dividing both the numerator and denominator by n^(2/3) is a valid technique.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Familiarity with the Sandwich Theorem
  • Knowledge of algebraic manipulation of expressions
  • Basic understanding of asymptotic behavior of functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about the Sandwich Theorem and its applications in limit proofs
  • Study techniques for simplifying limits involving polynomial and radical expressions
  • Explore asymptotic analysis and its relevance in calculus
  • Practice rewriting complex expressions to facilitate limit evaluation
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, educators teaching limit concepts, and anyone seeking to improve their understanding of limit evaluation techniques.

FaroukYasser
Messages
62
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Show that ##\lim _{ n\rightarrow \infty }{ \left( \frac { \sqrt { n+c } +d }{ \sqrt [ 3 ]{ { n }^{ 2 }+an+b } } \right) } =0,\quad n>-c ##

Homework Equations


Sandwich theorem

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, So I know my method is extremely long, I'm just wandering if 1) It is correct and 2)If there is any better way than this.

##If\quad n>\frac { -b }{ a } And\quad n>{ d }^{ 2 }-c\\ \Longrightarrow \quad 0\quad <\quad \frac { \sqrt { n+c } +d }{ \sqrt [ 3 ]{ { n }^{ 2 }+an+b } } \le \frac { \sqrt { n+c } +\left| d \right| }{ \sqrt [ 3 ]{ { n }^{ 2 }+an+b } } \quad <\quad \frac { \sqrt { n+c } +\left| d \right| }{ \sqrt { { n }^{ 2 }+an+b } } <\frac { \sqrt { n+c } +\left| d \right| }{ \sqrt { { n }^{ 2 } } } =\frac { \sqrt { n+c } +\left| d \right| }{ n } \\ \\ <\quad \frac { \sqrt { n+c } +\left| d \right| \sqrt { n+c } }{ n } =\frac { (1+\left| d \right| )(\sqrt { n+c } ) }{ n } <\frac { (1+\left| d \right| )(\sqrt { n+n } ) }{ n } ,\quad for\quad n>\left| c \right| =\frac { \sqrt { 2 } (1+\left| d \right| ) }{ \sqrt { n } } \\ \therefore \quad for\quad n>max\left\{ \frac { -b }{ a } ,\left| c \right| ,{ d }^{ 2 }-c \right\} \quad \Longrightarrow \quad 0\quad <\quad \frac { \sqrt { n+c } +d }{ \sqrt [ 3 ]{ { n }^{ 2 }+an+b } } \quad <\quad \frac { \sqrt { 2 } (1+\left| d \right| ) }{ \sqrt { n } } \\ \because \quad \lim _{ n\rightarrow \infty }{ \left( \frac { \sqrt { 2 } (1+\left| d \right| ) }{ \sqrt { n } } \right) } =0\quad Then\quad by\quad the\quad sandwitch\quad theorem\quad \lim _{ n\rightarrow \infty }{ \left( \frac { \sqrt { n+c } +d }{ \sqrt [ 3 ]{ { n }^{ 2 }+an+b } } \right) } =0##

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Divide both numerator and denominator by the same right power of n, and you can take easy limits everywhere.
 
mfb said:
Divide both numerator and denominator by the same right power of n, and you can take easy limits everywhere.
Thanks. I was wandering though, is my method ok or does it have any flaw in the logic? I am just trying to exercise with the sandwich theorem so I just want to make sure the steps are moving logically. And dividing the numerator and denominator by n^(2/3) would do the trick right?
 
FaroukYasser said:
And dividing the numerator and denominator by n^(2/3) would do the trick right?
Yes.
FaroukYasser said:
is my method ok or does it have any flaw in the logic?
That step does not work, you increase the denominator (in general), so you reduce the fraction when going from the left to the right:
$$\frac { \sqrt { n+c } +\left| d \right| }{ \sqrt [ 3 ]{ { n }^{ 2 }+an+b } } \quad <\quad \frac { \sqrt { n+c } +\left| d \right| }{ \sqrt { { n }^{ 2 }+an+b } }$$
There is a long way, but it is complicated.
 
FaroukYasser said:

Homework Statement


Show that ##\lim _{ n\rightarrow \infty }{ \left( \frac { \sqrt { n+c } +d }{ \sqrt [ 3 ]{ { n }^{ 2 }+an+b } } \right) } =0,\quad n>-c ##

Homework Equations


Sandwich theorem

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, So I know my method is extremely long, I'm just wandering if 1) It is correct and 2)If there is any better way than this.

##If\quad n>\frac { -b }{ a } And\quad n>{ d }^{ 2 }-c\\ \Longrightarrow \quad 0\quad <\quad \frac { \sqrt { n+c } +d }{ \sqrt [ 3 ]{ { n }^{ 2 }+an+b } } \le \frac { \sqrt { n+c } +\left| d \right| }{ \sqrt [ 3 ]{ { n }^{ 2 }+an+b } } \quad <\quad \frac { \sqrt { n+c } +\left| d \right| }{ \sqrt { { n }^{ 2 }+an+b } } <\frac { \sqrt { n+c } +\left| d \right| }{ \sqrt { { n }^{ 2 } } } =\frac { \sqrt { n+c } +\left| d \right| }{ n } \\ \\ <\quad \frac { \sqrt { n+c } +\left| d \right| \sqrt { n+c } }{ n } =\frac { (1+\left| d \right| )(\sqrt { n+c } ) }{ n } <\frac { (1+\left| d \right| )(\sqrt { n+n } ) }{ n } ,\quad for\quad n>\left| c \right| =\frac { \sqrt { 2 } (1+\left| d \right| ) }{ \sqrt { n } } \\ \therefore \quad for\quad n>max\left\{ \frac { -b }{ a } ,\left| c \right| ,{ d }^{ 2 }-c \right\} \quad \Longrightarrow \quad 0\quad <\quad \frac { \sqrt { n+c } +d }{ \sqrt [ 3 ]{ { n }^{ 2 }+an+b } } \quad <\quad \frac { \sqrt { 2 } (1+\left| d \right| ) }{ \sqrt { n } } \\ \because \quad \lim _{ n\rightarrow \infty }{ \left( \frac { \sqrt { 2 } (1+\left| d \right| ) }{ \sqrt { n } } \right) } =0\quad Then\quad by\quad the\quad sandwitch\quad theorem\quad \lim _{ n\rightarrow \infty }{ \left( \frac { \sqrt { n+c } +d }{ \sqrt [ 3 ]{ { n }^{ 2 }+an+b } } \right) } =0##

Thanks in advance

There is an easier way: write the numerator as
\text{numerator} = \sqrt{n+c} + d = \sqrt{n} \left( \left(1 + \frac{c}{n} \right)^{1/2} + \frac{d}{\sqrt{n}} \right)
and the denominator as
\text{denominator} = \sqrt[3]{n^2 + an + b} = n^{2/3} \left( 1 + \frac{a}{n} + \frac{b}{n^2} \right)^{1/3}
If you really insist on using the sandwich theorem you could start by finding simple upper and lower bounds on ##(1 + x)^{1/2}## and ##(1+x)^{1/3}## for small ##|x|##. However, avoiding the sandwich theorem altogether seems much simpler.
 
  • Like
Likes FaroukYasser
Ray Vickson said:
There is an easier way: write the numerator as
\text{numerator} = \sqrt{n+c} + d = \sqrt{n} \left( \left(1 + \frac{c}{n} \right)^{1/2} + \frac{d}{\sqrt{n}} \right)
and the denominator as
\text{denominator} = \sqrt[3]{n^2 + an + b} = n^{2/3} \left( 1 + \frac{a}{n} + \frac{b}{n^2} \right)^{1/3}
If you really insist on using the sandwich theorem you could start by finding simple upper and lower bounds on ##(1 + x)^{1/2}## and ##(1+x)^{1/3}## for small ##|x|##. However, avoiding the sandwich theorem altogether seems much simpler.
Thanks a lot!
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K