Is There an Eigenstate for the Creation Operator?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of eigenstates in quantum mechanics, specifically regarding the creation operator. Participants clarify that an eigenstate is defined as a state that, when acted upon by an operator, returns the same state multiplied by a scalar (the eigenvalue). It is concluded that the creation operator does not have eigenstates because applying it raises the state to a higher energy level, thus never returning the original state. Conversely, the destruction operator has an eigenstate, which is the ground state, as it can return zero when acting on the lowest state. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these definitions and their implications in quantum mechanics.
  • #31
I apologize for the harsh tone of post #25.

Maybe I'm being picky, but I haven't seen anywhere in this thread a demonstration that a^\dagger has no eigenvalues and eigenvectors. Such a demonstration follows directly from

indigojoker said:
so thus, could i now conclude that the eigenvalues are continuously increasing when applying the creation operator, and hence the operator does not have an eigenstate

but, at this introductory level, I think the details need to be filled in.

Since \left\{ |n> \right\} is a basis for state space, an arbitrary state vector |\psi> can written

|\psi> = \sum_{n=0}^\infty c_n |n>.

Is it possible to find just the right values of the c_n's (e.g., some equal to zero, some equal to -1, some equal to 1/\sqrt{2}, some equal to 42, etc.) such that |\psi> is an eigenvector of a^\dagger?

Vigorous hand waving not allowed.:biggrin:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
George Jones said:
Since \left\{ |n> \right\} is a basis for state space, an arbitrary state vector |\psi> can written

|\psi> = \sum_{n=0}^\infty c_n |n>.

Is it possible to find just the right values of the c_n's (e.g., some equal to zero, some equal to -1, some equal to 1/\sqrt{2}, some equal to 42, etc.) such that |\psi> is an eigenvector of a^\dagger?

Vigorous hand waving not allowed.:biggrin:

I don't think so, but I'm not sure how to prove why.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K