MHB Is There an Iff Relation for Polynomial Divisibility in the Ring F[t, t^-1]?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relation
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

We have the following lemma:

Assume that the characteristic of $F$ is $p$ and $p>2$.
Then $(t^m-1)/(t^n-1)$ is a square in $F[t, t^{-1}]$ ($F[t,t^{-1}]$: the polynomials in $t$ and $t^{-1}$ with coefficients in the field $F$) if and only if $(\exists s \in \mathbb{Z}) m=np^s$.
Can we say something about $p=2$ ?

$$(\exists s \in \mathbb{Z})m=2^sn \Leftrightarrow \dots$$

If $(\exists s \in \mathbb{Z})m=2^sn$ then we have that:
$$t^m=t^{2^sn}=\left (t^n\right )^{2^s} \Rightarrow t^m-1=\left (t^n\right )^{2^s}-1=\left (t^n-1\right )^{2^s}$$

Can we write with that a $\Leftrightarrow$ relation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are the following lemmas:

Lemma 1.

For any $x$ in the ring $F[t,t^{-1}]$ ($F[t,t^{-1}]$: the polynomials in $t$ and $t^{-1}$ with coefficients in the field $F$), $x$ is a power of $t$ if and only if $x$ divides $1$ and $t-1$ divides $x-1$ (the divisibilities are meant, of course, in $F[t, t^{-1}]$).
Lemma 2.

$t^n-1$ divides $t^m-1$ in $F[t, t^{-1}]$ ($F[t,t^{-1}]$: the polynomials in $t$ and $t^{-1}$ with coefficients in the field $F$) if and only if $n$ divides $m$ in $\mathbb{Z}$.

If $\exists s \in \mathbb{Z}$ so that $m=2^s n$, then $2 \mid m$ and $n \mid m$.

We have the following:

$$2 \mid m \Leftrightarrow t^2-1 \mid t^m-1$$

and $$n \mid m \Leftrightarrow t^n-1 \mid t^m-1$$

Is this an "iff" statement?
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
823
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K