Is there an immersion from a closed manifold into $\mathbb{R}^n$?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris L T521
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical problem of proving that there is no immersion from a closed manifold \( M \) of dimension \( n \) into \( \mathbb{R}^n \). The problem asserts that a closed manifold, defined as compact without boundary, cannot be immersed in the same-dimensional Euclidean space. This conclusion is based on established results in differential topology and manifold theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of closed manifolds and their properties
  • Familiarity with immersion and embedding concepts in topology
  • Knowledge of differential topology principles
  • Basic comprehension of Euclidean spaces and their dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of closed manifolds in differential topology
  • Learn about immersion and embedding theorems in topology
  • Explore the implications of the Whitney embedding theorem
  • Investigate examples of manifolds and their immersions in higher-dimensional spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in topology and differential geometry, as well as students studying manifold theory and its applications.

Chris L T521
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
913
Reaction score
0
Here's this week's problem.

-----

Problem: Let $M$ be a closed (i.e., compact without boundary) manifold of dimension $n$. Prove that there is no immersion $M\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^n$.

-----

 
Physics news on Phys.org
No one answered this week's question. You can find my solution below.

Proof: We begin with a lemma.

Lemma: Let $M$ and $N$ be smooth manifolds with $M$ compact and let $f:M\rightarrow N$ be an immersion. Then $f$ is an open map and is surjective.

Proof of Lemma: We first show that $f$ is an open map. Let $V\subset M$ be open and let $y\in f(V)$. Then $y=f(x)$ for some $x\in V$. Since $f$ is an immersion, $Df(x)$ is nonsingular. By the Inverse Function Theorem, $x$ has an open neighborhood $U\subset V$ such that $f(U)$ is open. Then $U\subset V\implies f(U)\subset f(V)$ is an open neighborhood of $y$. Since we can do this for any $y\in V$, $f(V)$ is open.

Now, $M$ is open in $M$, so $f(M)$ is open in $N$ by above. Since $M$ is compact, we know that $f(M)$ is compact and thus closed since $N$ is Hausdorff. This implies that $f(M)$ is clopen. Since the only clopen subsets of a connected space are the entire space or the empty set, and since $N$ is connected, it follows that $f(M)=N$. Thus $f$ is surjective. $\hspace{.25in}\blacksquare$

We now proceed with the proof of the main result. Since $M$ is compact, $f(M)$ is compact. By the lemma, any immersion $f:M\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^n$ is an open map and is surjective. Let $\{U_{\alpha}\}_{\alpha\in A}$ be an open covering of $\mathbb{R}^n$. Then $\{f^{-1}(U_{\alpha})\}_{\alpha\in A}$ is an open covering on $M$. Since $M$ is compact, it must have a finite subcover, say $\{f^{-1}(U_{\alpha_i})\}_{i=1}^n$. Since $f$ is surjective, $\{f(f^{-1}(U_{\alpha_i}))\}_{i=1}^n=\{U_{\alpha_i}\}_{i=1}^n$. This now implies that any open covering of $\mathbb{R}^n$ has a finite subcover, contradicting the non-compactness of $\mathbb{R}^n$. Therefore, there exists no immersion $f:M\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^n$. $\hspace{.25in}\blacksquare$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
673
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
994
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K