Is there an inverse of Summation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cmcraes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Summation
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of finding the zeroes of a summation function g(x) defined as g(x) = ∑x=0∞ f(x). Participants express confusion over the use of the summation index x and its implications for defining g(x). Suggestions are made to redefine g(x) to clarify its relationship with the function f(x), particularly considering cases where f(nx) is used. The conversation highlights that there is no universal method for finding zeroes of such summations, emphasizing the need to analyze specific functions individually. Overall, the thread underscores the complexities involved in understanding infinite series and their properties.
cmcraes
Messages
99
Reaction score
6
Say for some general function f(x), and g(x) = ∑x=0 f(x) (assuming function is defined)
Is there a way to find the zeroes of g(x)? Is there any relationship between the zeroes of f(x) and g(x)? Sorry if this question is poorly asked, i just began learning about summations and infinite series.
Thanks
 
  • Like
Likes ReubenDS
Physics news on Phys.org
cmcraes said:
Say for some general function f(x), and g(x) = ∑x=0 f(x)

This makes no sense.

First a minor point, but your summation index is ##x##, which is an unusual choice. So I assume you sum over the naturals?

Second, your summation index is ##x## so it shouldn't be used outside the summation. Setting ##g(x)## equal to this makes little sense to me.

Indeed, by definition we can write

\sum_{x=0}^{+\infty} f(x) = f(0) + f(1) + f(2) + f(3) + ...

So your equality

g(x) = \sum_{x=0}^{+\infty} f(x)

means

g(x) = f(0) + f(1) + f(2) + f(3) + ...

which is probably not what you want.
 
What if we assume N is being used in the function f(x)
And we reset g(x) (I'm on mobile right now so I can't use symbols) to equal

G(x) = Summation from N=0 to +Infinity of f(x)?
 
cmcraes said:
What if we assume N is being used in the function f(x)
And we reset g(x) (I'm on mobile right now so I can't use symbols) to equal

G(x) = Summation from N=0 to +Infinity of f(x)?

Now ##f(x)## is independent from ##N##. So you're just adding a bunch of constants. Is this your intention?
 
How about a function f(nx)?
(Maybe I just need to go learn more about Infinite series and Functions)
 
  • Like
Likes ReubenDS
cmcraes said:
How about a function f(nx)?
(Maybe I just need to go learn more about Infinite series and Functions)

So you're considering

g(x) = \sum_{n=0}^{+\infty} f(nx)

?
 
Say the function f(x) is (off the top of my head): x^3/(1-n)^x

How would we go about finding the zeroes g(x) of the sum of From n=0 to +infinity? Or am I asking all the wrong questions?
 
cmcraes said:
Say the function f(x) is (off the top of my head): x^3/(1-n)^x

How would we go about finding the zeroes g(x) of the sum of From n=0 to +infinity? Or am I asking all the wrong questions?

I don't really think there is one universal method. Some things work in one occasion but not in the other. I think the best you can do is to consider a specific function and try to work it out for that.
 
OKay, Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K