Is there any physical significance to Wave Amplitude?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physical significance of wave amplitude in quantum mechanics (QM), specifically the wave function ##\psi(x,t)## derived from Schrödinger's equation. The wave function serves as a complex probability amplitude, crucial for calculating the probability of measurement outcomes, such as position, where ##P(x) = |\psi(x)|^{2}##. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics before delving into alternative interpretations. Recommended resources include the textbook by Tipler and the Feynman Lectures on Physics, particularly Volume III.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Schrödinger's equation in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with the concept of probability amplitudes
  • Knowledge of wave functions and their normalization
  • Basic grasp of quantum measurement theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Feynman Lectures on Physics, Volume III
  • Explore the concept of wave function collapse and state reduction
  • Learn about probability distributions in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate various interpretations of quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum physics, educators teaching quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in the foundational aspects of wave functions and their implications in quantum theory.

reis1212
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
I am studying Quantum physics and I'm having some problems to understand what is the Wave Amplitude since I can't find a physical significance to it. Does anyone ever heard something that come close to a physical significance?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean the amplitude of the wave function ##\psi(x,t)## which is the solution of Schrödinger's equation?

Also, what book are you studying QM from? You'll get more and more helpful answers if we know what you're working with.
 
Isn't this a subject of QM interpretations?
 
reis1212 said:
I am studying Quantum physics and I'm having some problems to understand what is the Wave Amplitude since I can't find a physical significance to it. Does anyone ever heard something that come close to a physical significance?
A key concept in QM is that of the (complex) probability amplitude, which governs how probabilities work and represents a fundamental difference from classical physics.
 
Yes, the solution of Schrödinger's equation. English isn't my mother language so i didn't know how to refeer to it. I am using Tipler but I didn't find a analogy. Does it even have a physical significance?
 
The wave function is used to calculate probability of the various measurement outcomes. For example, if position is measured, the probability of observing various positions is ##P(x) = |\psi(x)|^{2}##. The formula is different if one measures another quantity such as energy or momentum, but always involves the wave function.

The Schroedinger equation predicts how the wave function changes with time between measurements. At the point of measurement, the Schroedinger equation does not apply, and the wave function undergoes a discontinuous change called "collapse" or "state reduction" that depends on the measurement result.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: reis1212 and vanhees71
To be more precise ##P(x)=|\psi(x)|^2## is the probability distribution for the particle's position. For continuous variables you have always probability distributions rather than probabilities. The meaning is that the probability to find the particle in an "infinitesimally small interval" ##\mathrm{d}(x)## around the position ##x## is given by ##\mathrm{d} x P(x)=\mathrm{d} x |\psi(x)|^2##.

Of course the probability for the particle being somewhere is ##1##, i.e., all this holds if the wave function is properly normalized, i.e.,
$$\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} x P(x) = \int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} x |\psi(x)|^2=1.$$
This is the standard interpretation of the physical meaning of the wave function, and it's good advice to abstain from reading about all kinds of alternative "interpretations" and other philosophical issues until you have a good understanding of quantum mechanics within its standard interpretation. The best interpretation to learn QT is not to bother about these overly confusing (and in many cased also indeed confused) metaphysical ideas but stick to the "shutup and calculation interpretation", which is best expressed in the Feynman Lectures vol. III, which I highly recommend to read in parallel with Tipler. It's even legally free to read online:

https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: BvU, jtbell and atyy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K