Is there ever a time when the simplest solution won't work?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the teaching methods in mathematics, specifically the preference for complicated solutions over simpler ones. Participants explore whether there are instances where more complex methods are necessary and express their experiences with different teaching styles.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants observe that professors often choose more complicated methods for solving problems, questioning the rationale behind this choice.
  • One participant suggests that while simpler methods may work in specific cases, more complicated methods like the matrix method (Gauss-Jordan) are necessary for more complex problems.
  • Another participant expresses frustration with teachers who do not accept creative solutions, emphasizing that mathematics should allow for logical correctness rather than strict adherence to predetermined methods.
  • Some participants reflect on their negative experiences with math due to the perception that there is only one correct way to solve problems, contrasting this with the idea that multiple methods can lead to the same solution.
  • One participant notes that showing multiple methods can be confusing for students, suggesting that teachers may prefer to follow a set approach to avoid this confusion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express differing views on the necessity of complicated methods versus simpler approaches. There is no consensus on whether the preference for complex solutions is justified or beneficial.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the importance of logical correctness in mathematical solutions, but there is uncertainty regarding the appropriateness of different teaching methods and their impact on student understanding.

Who May Find This Useful

Students and educators interested in teaching methodologies in mathematics, as well as those exploring the balance between simplicity and complexity in problem-solving approaches.

Tyrion101
Messages
166
Reaction score
2
Whenever I'm on math class I've noticed that often professors, and in my online class the videos and examples all seem to be the most complicated way to finding the answer. For example if solving for an equation by elimination they'll go for eliminating y, even though you could just as easily eliminate x without any modifications to the equation. Do they do this because they just prefer to eliminate y first? My second question is the topic. Is there ever a time when you just have to use that complicated solution your teacher taught you? I use the simplest way to solve a problem to eliminate as many possibilities for error I can. Is this a bad habit?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Tyrion101 said:
Whenever I'm on math class I've noticed that often professors, and in my online class the videos and examples all seem to be the most complicated way to finding the answer. For example if solving for an equation by elimination they'll go for eliminating y, even though you could just as easily eliminate x without any modifications to the equation. Do they do this because they just prefer to eliminate y first? My second question is the topic. Is there ever a time when you just have to use that complicated solution your teacher taught you? I use the simplest way to solve a problem to eliminate as many possibilities for error I can. Is this a bad habit?

Mathematicians are lazy people. They will try to find the easiest solution as possible and make sure they don't work hard. So no, it's not a bad habit :-p
However, the simplest method might sometimes only work in special cases, while a more complicated method works more generally. So this is why you sometimes see people solving things the hard way. They just want to illustrate a method that always works.

For example, if you want to solve systems with ##2## equations and ##2## unknowns, then this is very simple using the simpler methods. However, there is also something called the matrix method (or Gauss-Jordan), which is a little bit more complicated and definitely overkill. However, for more complicated cases like ##4## equations and ##4## unkowns, the Gauss-Jordan method with matrices is definitely the easiest one. So people show you the Gauss-Jordan method in the simpler case just so you can get used to it.

As for your other questions. If you can find the answer easier by eliminating ##x##, then go for it. In math there are no predetermined steps you are forced to take. You just need to make sure all your steps are logically correct. As long as that's true, you can do whatever you want to solve the problem! I don't know why your teacher eliminated ##y##, you should ask him/her.
 
Thank you, I've had both types of teachers, one would not accept any creativity in answering questions, the other would give extra credit, or not mark wrong for not doing it their way.
 
Tyrion101 said:
Thank you, I've had both types of teachers, one would not accept any creativity in answering questions

That's pretty sad. Well, of course it still needs to be correct. But if every step is logically correct, then it's pretty sad that the teacher won't give it full marks. Mathematics is not about following some predetermined scheme like computers. Mathematics is creativity!
 
I think that's why I've hated math for so many years, and why I was confused when people had many different ways of solving an equation, or problem. And maybe I just misunderstood that they were only trying to illustrate something, but to me it felt like they were saying there is just one way to the answer. (Obviously not referring to problems involving just arithmetic, 2+2 never equals 5)
 
Tyrion101 said:
I think that's why I've hated math for so many years, and why I was confused when people had many different ways of solving an equation, or problem. And maybe I just misunderstood that they were only trying to illustrate something, but to me it felt like they were saying there is just one way to the answer. (Obviously not referring to problems involving just arithmetic, 2+2 never equals 5)

One of the nice things about math is that every question has a unique solution, but many ways to find the solution. However, showing more than one way is often confusing to students, so I guess the teachers like to follow some predetermined scheme to solve the problem. Sad though that it's contrary to the spirit of mathematics.

Obviously, Feynman always says it better than me:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZED4gITL28
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K