# Information traveling faster than light? (thought experiment)

• I
• kurosama
In summary: A), and a mass inside the trailer moves at a speed of .9c relative to the trailer. Relative to A, the mass doesn't move at 1.8c. Instead it moves at (.9 + .9)/(1+ (.9)*(.9)) c = .9945c (appx).
kurosama
TL;DR Summary
I have a system that seems to suggest that it may possible to transfer information at much greater speeds than light. This seems completely ridiculous and I am definitely missing an important factor in my speculations/calculations. I need help understanding this phenomenon and where am I going wrong in this thought experiment.
Let us consider a hypothetical scenario, where we are able to translate any mass at a constant speed of 10m/s w.r.t to a given frame of reference. For simplicity, we are going to assume that the object is at rest initially.

Case 1 -
Now, consider 2 points A and B at a distance of 10m, and our goal is to transport some information from point A to point B in 1s. Now, this is a trivial case, in this case, we can simply send a point mass M at the constant speed of 10m/s and achieve the goal.

Case 2 -
Now, let's suppose points A and B are 20m apart, and our goal is again to transport the information in 1s. In this case, we can create a 10m long trailer starting at A, now we move the trailer at 10m/s, and place the point mass inside the trailer, and move the point mass at 10m/s wrt to the trailer, so in this case the front of the trailer covers 10m in 1s, the point mass covers the distance inside the trailer in 1s and reaches it's front. So effectively, we were able to cover 20m in 1s.

Case 3 -
Now, similarly, assume, A and B were at 30m. In this case, we can initially place a 20m long trailer, and then a 10m long trailer inside of it, and then the point mass inside of it, the outermost trailer moves at 10m/s w.r.t the observer outside, the inner trailer moves at 10m/s wrt to the outermost trailer, the point mass moves at 10m/s w.r.t the innermost trailer, so we are able to cover 30m in 1s with the point mass.

Now, similarly carrying on for extremely large distances (please refer to the image), this framework seems to suggest that any arbitrary distance can be covered in just 1s without any cosmic limits affecting it. Of course, the setting is hypothetical and practically it may never be possible to achieve such a mechanic.

This mechanics is causing a lot of confusion and I am unable to figure out what's wrong with my calculations. Of course, the scenario is completely hypothetical, but I believe imposing natural boundaries that we can never build such machinery shouldn't stop us from speculating a possible observation if it were to exist. This model suggests that the information the point mass is carrying is traveling faster than light which should not be possible. I am not really concerned with the relative speed of the innermost trailer wrt to an observer on A, but rather being mostly confused about the fact that how is such a large distance covered in just 1s. Case 1, 2, 3 are not so fictional and we can see this happening in real life as well. So how is it that just by increasing the number of outer trailers I am bounded by space and time to not exceed the speed of light wrt someone else?

PS: I am not sure if the question is a repeat of someone proposing a similar scenario, I am new to the forum and couldn't find anything similar to the scenario that I am looking for, and it was incredibly hard to find material on what's going on with the distances!

Google relativistic velocity addition. Simplify your example so there is just one trailer and it moves at .9c relative to A, and a mass inside moves at .9c relative to the trailer. Then, relative to A, the mass does not move at 1.8c. Instead it moves at (.9 + .9)/(1+ (.9)*(.9)) c = .9945c (appx).

vanhees71 and Grasshopper
Actually, I am aware of the relativistic velocity addition formula, however, what I am unable to understand is what happens to the distances. For an observer inside the innermost trailer, for him he should travel the 10m in 1s, and so should all the trailers, so an observer on each trailer should note only 1s as the commuting time. As I say it, I conclude is it so that the time for the innermost trailer is not the same as the outermost trailer?

kurosama said:
Actually, I am aware of the relativistic velocity addition formula, however, what I am unable to understand is what happens to the distances. For an observer inside the innermost trailer, for him he should travel the 10m in 1s, and so should all the trailers, so an observer on each trailer should note only 1s as the commuting time. As I say it, I conclude is it so that the time for the innermost trailer is not the same as the outermost trailer?
Ever heard of length contraction? time dilation? Also, please forget the nesting. It is a wholly unnecessary complication. One trailer and one mass are sufficient to understand all the issues, with high relative speeds.

vanhees71 and Grasshopper
One question you ask is how a large distance is covered in a short time. The key is that if the distance is per A and the time is per a mass moving at high speed with respect A, there is no limit to such a ratio. There is no problem having a clock traverse the distance from Earth to the Andromeda galaxy while elapsing only one second on the clock.

Last edited:
vanhees71 and kurosama
kurosama said:
Actually, I am aware of the relativistic velocity addition formula, however, what I am unable to understand is what happens to the distances.
It's a bit messy because you need to account for time dilation, length contraction and the relativity of simultaneity. It's very simple to apply the Lorentz transforms and work out what's going on (at least if you follow @PAllen's recommendation and use one car inside another instead of a huge stack of nested cars, although I'd recommend using 0.8c as the velocity because at least some of the numbers are nice). But because the outer car's clocks aren't synchronised in the ground frame you can't simply add length contracted distances and expect them to add up to 1s times the velocity addition formula velocity.

PeterDonis and vanhees71

## 1. How is it possible for information to travel faster than light?

According to Einstein's theory of relativity, nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. However, this thought experiment explores the concept of hypothetical particles called tachyons, which are theorized to travel faster than light and potentially carry information with them.

## 2. What would be the implications of information traveling faster than light?

If information could travel faster than light, it would challenge our current understanding of physics and the laws of causality. It could also potentially allow for instantaneous communication and time travel, which could have significant consequences for our understanding of the universe.

## 3. Is there any evidence for information traveling faster than light?

Currently, there is no scientific evidence to support the idea of information traveling faster than light. It remains a thought experiment and has not been observed or proven in any experiments or observations.

## 4. How does this thought experiment relate to the concept of wormholes?

Wormholes, also known as Einstein-Rosen bridges, are hypothetical tunnels that connect two distant points in space-time. Some theories suggest that if tachyons exist, they could potentially travel through these wormholes and carry information with them, allowing for faster-than-light communication.

## 5. Could the concept of information traveling faster than light have any practical applications?

At this point, the idea of information traveling faster than light remains purely theoretical and has not been proven to be possible. However, if it were to be proven, it could have significant implications for communication and transportation, potentially revolutionizing the way we interact with the world.

• Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
2K
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
667
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
28
Views
1K
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
915
• Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
940
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
23
Views
999
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
1K
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
45
Views
4K
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
2K
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
1K