Is there such a thing as a virtual dimension

  • Thread starter Thread starter brianhurren
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimension Virtual
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of a "virtual dimension" in relation to movement within defined dimensions. It concludes that a dimension must have a rigorous definition and that if movement in the Z dimension can be expressed solely through movements in the X and Y dimensions, then the Z dimension cannot be classified as a true dimension. The participants reference mathematical and physical definitions to support this conclusion, emphasizing the necessity for independent movement in a dimension to qualify it as such.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical definitions of dimensions
  • Familiarity with vector space concepts
  • Basic knowledge of physics related to dimensions
  • Ability to interpret mathematical formulas
NEXT STEPS
  • Research mathematical definitions of dimensions in detail
  • Explore vector space theory and its applications
  • Study the implications of dimensions in physics
  • Learn about dimensional analysis and its relevance in various fields
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of dimensions and their implications in movement and space.

brianhurren
Messages
71
Reaction score
2
Is there such a thing as a virtual dimension. for instance if you move on a two dimensional surface, say you take 4 steps in x dimension and then 3 steps in y dimension and then say in z 3 steps, and to move in z you step x+(some predefined formula) and y+(some predefined formula). The z dimension is essentially that predefined formula. You can move on the plane is if there is an extra dimension, though obviously there isn't one, just behaves as though there is one...could z be considered a virtual dimension?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
No. Dimensions have rigorous definitions (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimension_(mathematics_and_physics )), but the bottom line is that if I can express "movement in the Z dimension" by movement in the X and Y dimensions then the "Z dimension" isn't a dimension at all. For it to be a dimension it would have to be the case that movement in the Z-direction would get me somewhere that I could never get by just moving in the x/y dimensions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K