Is There Water Ice on Mars?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jim mcnamara
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ice Mars News
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the potential existence of water ice on Mars, particularly in relation to recent observations and findings from the Phoenix lander. Participants explore various hypotheses regarding the nature of observed white substances, the implications for life on Mars, and the scientific methods used to analyze these findings.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express excitement about the possibility of finding water ice on Mars, suggesting it could have implications for life.
  • Others argue that the presence of ice on Mars is not new information and emphasize the importance of examining it scientifically.
  • There are claims that the observed white material may be dry ice (frozen CO2), with some participants suggesting that the conditions on Mars could allow for its stability.
  • Concerns are raised about relying solely on photographic evidence to classify the white material as ice, with calls for more scientific analysis using instruments on the Phoenix lander.
  • Some participants speculate on the temperature conditions on Mars and how they might affect the state of the observed materials.
  • There are discussions about the formation of the observed "chunks" and whether they could be indicative of water or dry ice, with differing opinions on the processes involved.
  • References to external articles and studies are made to support various claims about the Martian environment and the behavior of CO2.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the nature of the white material observed on Mars, with multiple competing views regarding whether it is water ice or dry ice. The discussion remains unresolved with ongoing debate about the implications of the findings.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the reliance on visual evidence and the need for further data regarding temperature and atmospheric conditions on Mars. The discussion also highlights the speculative nature of some claims regarding the presence of water ice versus dry ice.

  • #31
yeah--but those are ave. temps----you'd have to know the temp and pressure (and the atmospheric concentration of co2) where the thing landed (and the temp of the ground a couple inches down:wink:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
rewebster said:
yeah--but those are ave. temps----you'd have to know the temp and pressure (and the atmospheric concentration of co2) where the thing landed (and the temp of the ground a couple inches down:wink:)

Well, you do have to consider the average temps as they change seasonally. That, and I doubt there's drastic changes CO2 movement over a period of just a few hours, or even days. It gives the latitude in the link... 47.2 slightly lower than the Phoenix.
 
Last edited:
  • #33
Ah, this isn't the first time we've found water on Mars!
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap050401.html

This is certainly an interesting discovery, and evidence is pointing to the likelihood that it really is water!
 
  • #34
I think there is water on Mars, but I still don't think those white chunks were (are) water.


You know what would really be funny (funny in the way of the discovery) would be that all those 'water' features (the valleys, dry river beds, etc.) were caused by liquid CO2 instead of liquid water. If all the circumstances were just right (like on Earth for the glaciers to create those 'U' shaped valleys, all those river beds on Mars could have been created by liquid CO2.
 
  • #35
rewebster said:
I think there is water on Mars, but I still don't think those white chunks were (are) water. You know what would really be funny (funny in the way of the discovery) would be that all those 'water' features (the valleys, dry river beds, etc.) were caused by liquid CO2 instead of liquid water. If all the circumstances were just right (like on Earth for the glaciers to create those 'U' shaped valleys, all those river beds on Mars could have been created by liquid CO2.

I think that's been one of the theories so far since Mars atmosphere is over 95% CO2. Allow the atmosphere to be saturated with enough CO2, and you'll have CO2 condensation. And if the atmosphere was actually thick enough, you'd have the pressure available for it ran down as a liquid and flow.
 
  • #36
B. Elliott said:
I think that's been one of the theories so far since Mars atmosphere is over 95% CO2. Allow the atmosphere to be saturated with enough CO2, and you'll have CO2 condensation. And if the atmosphere was actually thick enough, you'd have the pressure available for it ran down as a liquid and flow.

I hadn't heard of it before--I'll look around- ...or if anyone else can find it first.
 
  • #38
B. Elliott said:

thanks---good theory---a good 'find', there, B. Elliott ---

-he keeps saying that the valleys weren't caused by 'liquid'--however, I think that there will still be a way for liquid CO2 to flow there--maybe still mixed with that h2o that he mentions. Some of those valleys are (seem) just too much like a 'fluid' erosion, and not a "density flow". Maybe a variation of his idea of underground 'pressure'.

"These flows are part of a suite of "Density Flows", so named because they consist of a dense fluidised cloud that flows downhill as if it were a fluid."

http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-water-science-00k2.html
 
  • #39
rewebster said:
I think there is water on Mars, but I still don't think those white chunks were (are) water.


You know what would really be funny (funny in the way of the discovery) would be that all those 'water' features (the valleys, dry river beds, etc.) were caused by liquid CO2 instead of liquid water. If all the circumstances were just right (like on Earth for the glaciers to create those 'U' shaped valleys, all those river beds on Mars could have been created by liquid CO2.
I believe thay have ruled out dry ice:
We can easily and confidently rule out that its carbon dioxide ice," said Lemmon. "There are certainly times of the year that there would be CO2 ice at this location but with the temperatures we are measuring there, it would be the equivalent of water ice existing on Earth at 140 degrees. It wouldn't be there very long, and wouldn't be there long enough for us to take its picture, and it wouldn't last the night. We're very confident this is not CO2 ice.
http://www.universetoday.com/2008/0...ference-update-proof-of-water-ice/#more-15217
 
  • #40
I think all they have to do is stick a thermometer down into the 'chunks' the next time they make a trench----

betcha it's dry ice (like a dry ice tundra)


I think the 'surface' temps are probably a whole lot different than even just a couple of inches down on Mars at/near the poles (less direct sun, just like here on Earth). E.g.---how far down is 'frozen tundra' on Earth when its 70-80 degrees F on the surface? --and Mars has a whole lot less atmosphere to aid in the warming of the 'dirt', too.


I wonder how warm the core of Mars is?
 
  • #41
I think we can definitely rule out carbon dioxide. Mars' atmosphere has a pressure of 0.007 times that of Earth, or 0.007 atm or 700 Pa. At this pressure, carbon dioxide could be solid only at extremely low temperature, close to absolute zero. Even if it could survive underground as ice, it would sublimate almost instantly when coming in contact with the Martian atmosphere.

Water, can exist as ice, because its triple point is at 0.006 atm (almost the pressure of Mars' atmosphere) and about 0 degrees Celsius. This would allow water to sublimate if the temperature rose enough.

This is where I got my info on water and carbon dioxide (I got the atmospheric pressure on Mars from a book):

http://www.uiowa.edu/~c004131a/Phase_Diagrams.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #42
Today:

"After weeks of testing the soil in the Martian arctic, NASA's Phoenix lander has confirmed through chemical analysis the presence of water on another planet, scientists revealed today."


"The fact that it melted at 0 degrees centigrade leaves very little doubt," said Boynton, speaking at a news conference in Tucson"

http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-sci-phoenix1-2008aug01,0,3012423.story


"Laboratory tests aboard NASA's Phoenix Mars Lander have identified water in a soil sample. The lander's robotic arm delivered the sample Wednesday to an instrument that identifies vapors produced by the heating of samples."

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/phoenix/news/phoenix-20080731.html

so...it is water



jqnsmart said:
I think we can definitely rule out carbon dioxide. Mars' atmosphere has a pressure of 0.007 times that of Earth, or 0.007 atm or 700 Pa. At this pressure, carbon dioxide could be solid only at extremely low temperature, close to absolute zero. Even if it could survive underground as ice, it would sublimate almost instantly when coming in contact with the Martian atmosphere.

Water, can exist as ice, because its triple point is at 0.006 atm (almost the pressure of Mars' atmosphere) and about 0 degrees Celsius. This would allow water to sublimate if the temperature rose enough.

This is where I got my info on water and carbon dioxide (I got the atmospheric pressure on Mars from a book):

http://www.uiowa.edu/~c004131a/Phase_Diagrams.html

but there are carbon dioxide polar caps not too far away
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #43
Sorry it has taken me so long to respond, but I had a problem with my internet company that lasted quite some time. I do, however, feel an obligation to respond. Even thought the polar ice caps are nearby, any carbon dioxide exposed would sublimate almost instantly, especially since it was summer then. In fact the ice caps sublimate in the summer and reform in the winter.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
47
Views
7K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
838
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K