Is this a Stirling number of the second kind?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter HAYAO
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Phonon Stirling
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of Equation (3.17) from a paper discussing phonon sidebands, multiphonon relaxation, and phonon-assisted energy transfer. The equation involves Stirling numbers of the second kind, specifically questioning the validity of having a larger bottom number than the top number in the braces. The conclusion reached is that the notation used in the equation is indeed correct, with upper and lower case corresponding to the plus and minus signs, respectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Stirling numbers of the second kind
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts, particularly phonon interactions
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical notation in physics
  • Ability to interpret complex equations in scientific literature
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Stirling numbers of the second kind and their applications in physics
  • Study phonon sidebands and their role in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about multiphonon relaxation processes in quantum systems
  • Examine the mathematical formulation of phonon-assisted energy transfer
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students studying quantum mechanics or mathematical physics who are interested in the application of Stirling numbers in physical phenomena.

HAYAO
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
381
Reaction score
238
I saw this paper that talks about phonon sidebands, multiphonon relaxation, and phonon-assisted energy transfer.

I was skimming through each of the equations, but I have problem understanding the formulation of some of them, for example Equation (3.17):
g_{\pm }(t) = \int d\omega \begin{Bmatrix} n_{\omega }\\ n_{\omega } +1 \end{Bmatrix}exp\left ( \pm i\omega t \right )

If I understand correctly, the part in the braces is the Stirling numbers of the second kind. However, it doesn't make sense to me that the bottom number is larger than the top number, because that should only give zero. So is this something else?

EDIT: dear the moderators. I wasn't really sure where this thread belongs. Purely from mathematics, this thread could belong in the math section, but considering that the discussion centers around the physical aspect of a quantum mechanical phenomena, I decided to put this in this section.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Iliody
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't seen the paper, but would it make sense that upper (lower) case corresponds to the plus (minus) sign?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: HAYAO
Demystifier said:
I haven't seen the paper, but would it make sense that upper (lower) case corresponds to the plus (minus) sign?
Oh, now it makes great sense. Sorry for the bum question. Thank you very much!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K