Is this Free-Body Diagram Correct?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the accuracy of a free-body diagram for a system involving a 1.25 kg cart and a 0.6 kg can connected by a pulley. The user calculated the net force, tension, and friction, arriving at values of 0.37 N for net force, 4 N for tension, and 1.5 N for friction. However, the tension formula used was questioned by other users, indicating it was not applicable to the scenario. The consensus suggests that the user needs to adjust the diagram to reflect the correct horizontal force application.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law (F = ma)
  • Knowledge of free-body diagrams (FBD)
  • Basic principles of tension in pulley systems
  • Concept of net force and frictional force calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of tension in pulley systems using correct formulas
  • Learn how to accurately draw and interpret free-body diagrams
  • Study the effects of friction on motion in connected systems
  • Explore advanced applications of Newton's laws in multi-body systems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking to clarify concepts related to free-body diagrams and tension in pulley systems.

DevonR
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have to draw a free body diagram representing the motion of an object @ a given point in time. This diagram is for section 1.

It's of a 1.25 kg cart with a 0.6 kg can attached to it with a pulley-system. When the can drops, the cart begins to move. In section one, when the can drops, the cart begins to accelerate forward.

Acceleration = 0.196 m/s(squared)
Mass of cart = 1.25 kg
Mass of can = 0.6 kg

Homework Equations

F = ma

The Attempt at a Solution



The diagram is uploaded here. I just want to know if this seems to be correct?

EDIT:

Heres the assmuptions I made

I calculated net force w/ acceleration provided = 0.196 m/s
and with the total mass (1.25 kg + 0.6 kg) = 1.9 kg
Net force = 0.37 N

I did normal force & force of gravity on the cart, which was 12.3 N for both.
The falling can was what caused the motion of the cart, so I calculated Fg = 5.9 N for the 0.6 kg can. No normal force obviously because it wasn't sitting on a surface.

But the can was attached to a string, which slowed down the falling can's motion. So I had to calculate F-tension. I used this formula to calculate it;

Force of Tension = 2m1m2/m1m2 x Gravity

I got 4N (3.97N) as the tension force.

So I assumed that the applied force would be Force of Gravity on the can MINUS the Force of Tension of the string holding the can. The applied force was 1.9 N

Then I calculated force of friction.
I assumed it to be the applied force minus net force
Which was 1.9 N - 0.37 N

For friction I got 1.5 N.

Does all of this seem correct? [/B]


freebody.jpg
 

Attachments

  • freebody.jpg
    freebody.jpg
    24.3 KB · Views: 530
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would have thought the set up would be so that the falling can moves the cart horizontally. As you've drawn it, the force on the cart is vertical.
 
Thanks for the reply! I added a written description of my 'attempt @ a solution' to the original post.
I see what you mean, so I should draw Fa = 1.9 horizontally.

Aside from that, is everything else okay?
 
DevonR said:
I got 4N (3.97N) as the tension force.
How did you get that? Without the tension, the acceleration would be g. So what tension is required to reduce it to the given acceleration?
 
haruspex said:
How did you get that? Without the tension, the acceleration would be g. So what tension is required to reduce it to the given acceleration?

I used this formula Force of Tension = 2m1m2/m1m2 x Gravity
to get the force of tension


 
DevonR said:
I used this formula Force of Tension = 2m1m2/m1m2 x Gravity
to get the force of tension

I've no idea where you get that equation from. All the m's seem to cancel.
 
DevonR said:
I got the formula from here

http://www.citycollegiate.com/tension1.htm
Two problems:
- you omitted the plus signs, minus signs and parentheses, making it impossible to decipher.
- it doesn't apply in your set up; compare the diagrams
It's quite easy from first principles without searching for answers on the net. Just consider the FBD of the hanging mass.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K