Is this general solution for ODE correct?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the general solution for the ordinary differential equation (ODE) given by dx/dt = 3x^(2) cos t. Participants are examining the correctness of proposed solutions and the integration process involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants present different integration approaches and question the validity of the steps taken in the original solution. There is a focus on the manipulation of terms and the integration of power functions.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various interpretations of the integration process, with some participants suggesting corrections to the original poster's method. There is an acknowledgment of the need to verify solutions by substituting them back into the original equation.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the integration of a rational function and discussing the implications of different algebraic manipulations. The original poster's assumptions and the correctness of their integration steps are under scrutiny.

andrey21
Messages
475
Reaction score
0
Find the general solution of the following ODE:

dx/dt = 3x^(2) cos t



Make x the subject of the solution.



Heres my solution, is this correct?

dx/dt = 3x^(2) cos t

dx/3x^(2) = cos t dt

Integrating both sides gives:

ln (3x^(2)) = sin t + C

3x^(2) = e^(sin t + C)

3x^(2) = Ae^(sin t)

x^(2) = (Ae^(sin t))/3)

x = SQRT(Ae^(sin t))/3)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jamiey1988 said:
Heres my solution, is this correct?

dx/dt = 3x^(2) cos t

dx/3x^(2) = cos t dt

Integrating both sides gives:

ln (3x^(2)) = sin t + C


here is where you went wrong,

1/3x2 can be written as x-2/3.

You know that ∫xn dx = xn+1/(n+1) + C for n≠-1
 
So from what you have said:

∫dx/3x^(2) = -1/3x + C or (-x^(-1)/3) + C

Giving a solution of:

-1/3x + C = sin t
 
That should be correct.
 
You can easily check your answer by plugging it back into the original differential equation and seeing if it works.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K