Is this in relation with quantum entanglement ?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between a proposed mathematical concept involving two states, A and B, which are described as opposites of each other, and the phenomenon of quantum entanglement. Participants explore whether the described properties of these states have any connection to quantum entanglement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a scenario where states A and B are opposites, suggesting that results from mathematical methods in one state can be obtained in the other, raising the question of a potential connection to quantum entanglement.
  • Another participant explains that entanglement implies that measuring a property of one particle determines the opposite property of its entangled partner, noting a similarity to the initial proposal but expressing uncertainty.
  • A further clarification is made about the nature of the relationship between states A and B, emphasizing that results can be achieved in one state without transitioning to the other, prompting a request for interpretation regarding its literal meaning and its relation to quantum entanglement.
  • A participant introduces a new algorithm where states A and B are described as parts of the same entity, indicating that a change in one state is instantly reflected in the other, and seeks assistance for reviewing this algorithm.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying interpretations of the relationship between the proposed states and quantum entanglement, with no consensus reached on whether there is a definitive connection.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of states A and B and their mathematical properties, which remain unspecified. The implications of the proposed algorithm and its relation to quantum mechanics are also not fully explored.

mixter
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Let’s say, state A is the opposite of state B and state B is the opposite of state A. Normally if each of the state has an opposite results of themselves to an extent that the result of a mathematical method in state A can be obtain in state B and the result of a mathematical method in state B can also be obtain in state A.

-Is this in relation with quantum entanglement in any way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Entanglement means that when you measure a value on a particle, the entangled partner can NOT be that value. Usually we refer to "spin" as an example of this. If you measure the spin of one particle, and you see that it is up, then the other MUST be down. This looks similar to what you are saying, but I can't be sure.
 
I mean for every given input, the result in A is opposite that of B and the result in B is opposite that of A. At a point, the result in B is achieved in A without shifting to B and the result in A is achieved in B also without shifting to A.

What does that suppose to mean literally? Is it related with quantum entanglement in any way?
 
In the new algorithm; A and B are two parts of the same entity such that a change in one is instantly reflected in the other and the other immediately fixes its results to the opposite value.

Please, I need someone who can help to review the new algorithm.
Anybody who is interested to assists the project can PM me. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K