Is this matrix exponentiation method correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jhenrique
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary
The matrix exponentiation method presented contains multiple errors. The assumption that the exponential of a sum of matrices equals the product of their exponentials is incorrect unless the matrices commute. Additionally, the claim that scaling a matrix by a scalar can be expressed as the exponential of the matrix raised to that scalar is also flawed. The discussion highlights the need for a correct understanding of matrix exponentiation properties. Overall, the method proposed does not yield valid results due to these misconceptions.
Jhenrique
Messages
676
Reaction score
4
Is correct my step by step below?

<br /> \begin{aligned}<br /> \exp \left (\begin{bmatrix} a_{11} &amp; a_{12} \\ a_{21} &amp; a_{22} \\ \end{bmatrix} \right ) &amp;= \exp \left ( a_{11} \begin{bmatrix} 1 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 0 \\ \end{bmatrix} + a_{22} \begin{bmatrix} 0 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 1 \\ \end{bmatrix} + a_{12} \begin{bmatrix} 0 &amp; 1 \\ 0 &amp; 0 \\ \end{bmatrix} + a_{21} \begin{bmatrix} 0 &amp; 0 \\ 1 &amp; 0 \\ \end{bmatrix} \right ) \\<br /> &amp; = \exp\left ( \begin{bmatrix} 1 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 0 \\ \end{bmatrix} \right )^{a_{11}} \exp\left ( \begin{bmatrix} 0 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 1 \\ \end{bmatrix} \right )^{a_{22}} \exp\left ( \begin{bmatrix} 0 &amp; 1 \\ 0 &amp; 0 \\ \end{bmatrix} \right )^{a_{12}} \exp\left ( \begin{bmatrix} 0 &amp; 0 \\ 1 &amp; 0 \\ \end{bmatrix} \right )^{a_{21}} \\<br /> &amp;= \begin{bmatrix} 1 &amp; 1 \\ 1 &amp; 0 \end{bmatrix}^{a_{11}} \begin{bmatrix} 0 &amp; 1 \\ 1 &amp; 1 \end{bmatrix}^{a_{22}} \begin{bmatrix} 1 &amp; 1 \\ 0 &amp; 1 \end{bmatrix}^{a_{12}} \begin{bmatrix} 1 &amp; 0 \\ 1 &amp; 1 \end{bmatrix}^{a_{21}}<br /> \end{aligned}
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Jhenrique! :smile:

Hint:

i] what is exp##\begin{bmatrix} a & 0 \\ 0 & a \\ \end{bmatrix}## ? what is exp##\begin{bmatrix} 0 & a \\ a & 0 \\ \end{bmatrix}## ?

ii] do your final matrices commute? :wink:
 
Jhenrique, I fixed your LaTeX so it doesn't spill across the screen.

The answer to your question is no. You made multiple errors. Your second line erroneously assumes ##\exp(A+B) = \exp(A)\exp(B)## and also erroneously assumes ##\exp(sA)=\exp(A)^s##.
 
Good morning I have been refreshing my memory about Leibniz differentiation of integrals and found some useful videos from digital-university.org on YouTube. Although the audio quality is poor and the speaker proceeds a bit slowly, the explanations and processes are clear. However, it seems that one video in the Leibniz rule series is missing. While the videos are still present on YouTube, the referring website no longer exists but is preserved on the internet archive...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
970
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K