Is this possible without a calculator?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Procrastinate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculator
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
Procrastinate
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
I was doing this problem about optimization and I derived it to:

R' = (1-lnx)/x2

(This was the right derivative by the way as the maximum on the R function was the same answer as when R' = 0)Anyways as R' = 0 when stationary points occur:

0 = (1-lnx)/x2

I was wondering whether it was possible to do that without the help of a graph/graphics calculator because of the zero there. I managed to get the correct answer which was x=2.71 but I couldn't do it manually because of the zero even when I used the null factor law (1-lnx) = 0 or 1/x2 = 0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
2.718281828... is the base of the natural log.

Plug ln(x) = 2.718281828 into your calculator. The answer should be close to 1.
 
Procrastinate said:
I was doing this problem about optimization and I derived it to:

R' = (1-lnx)/x2

(This was the right derivative by the way as the maximum on the R function was the same answer as when R' = 0)


Anyways as R' = 0 when stationary points occur:

0 = (1-lnx)/x2

(1-lnx) = 0 or 1/x2 = 0.

1-lnx=0 or lnx = 1

[tex]lnx = \log_e{x} = 1[/tex]

It is true when x = e = 2.71.