Is This Sequence a Cauchy Sequence?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining whether a given sequence, defined by the inequality |Sn+1-Sn|<2-n, qualifies as a Cauchy sequence. Participants are exploring the implications of this definition within the context of metric spaces and convergence.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to apply the triangle inequality to establish the Cauchy condition, with some questioning the necessity of proving the polygon identity. Others are considering the convergence of geometric series as a means to support their arguments.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing insights about the geometric series and its relevance to the Cauchy condition. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the application of the polygon identity and the implications of the sequence's properties.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the need to prove the polygon identity and how it relates to the problem at hand. The discussion reflects varying levels of familiarity with the concepts involved, including the properties of Cauchy sequences and geometric series.

jaqueh
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose the sequence (Sn) is defined as:
|Sn+1-Sn|<2-n
show that this is a cauchy sequence

Homework Equations


hint: prove the polygon identity such that
d(Sn,Sm)≤d(Sn,Sn+1)+d(Sn+1,Sn+2)...+d(Sm-1,Sm)

The Attempt at a Solution


I have defined Sm and Sn and created the inequality that:
d(Sn,Sm)=|2-n-2-m|>||Sn+1-Sn|-|Sm+1-Sm||
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Using the hint, you'd get |Sn-Sm|<|Sn-Sn+1|+...+|Sm-1-Sm|<2-n+...+2-m
Is there any type of cauchy sequence (perhaps of partial sums) that would fit the latter half?
 
ok I think I get what I can do now with the polygon ineq. except I thought that it would only be less than 2-n+...+2m-1also I don't know if I need to prove the polygon identity or not. if I did how would I go about it? would I use a fact of geometric series?
 
Proving the "polygon" identity comes as a direct result of the definition of a metric, and the triangle inequality. A simple proof by induction would suffice.
While it is true you could remove the factor of 2-m from the inequality, you can add it on and still have the inequality hold true (plus it's better looking notation wise).
We know Ʃ2-n is a geometric series, and thus converges. Convergent sequences of partial sums (partial sums of a geometric series) are cauchy sequences. So Ʃ2-k from 1 to n minus Ʃ2-k from 1 to m would be less than ε
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K