Is This Simplification of a Complex Fraction Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Isolex
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around simplifying complex fractions and solving a quadratic equation. Participants are exploring mathematical reasoning related to algebraic manipulation and problem-solving techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to simplify a complex fraction and are sharing various algebraic manipulations. Some express uncertainty about their methods and seek clarification on the correctness of their approaches. Others are working through a quadratic equation and discussing potential strategies for solving it.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of different methods for simplifying the fraction, with some participants providing hints and guidance without revealing complete solutions. The discussion includes attempts to clarify the setup of the problems and suggestions for using LaTex for better presentation.

Contextual Notes

One participant mentions that the math presented is difficult to follow, indicating a need for clearer formatting. Additionally, there are reminders about adhering to forum rules regarding the provision of complete solutions.

Isolex
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
It looks like this:

1 1
__ - _
1-t t
_________
1 1
__ - _
1+t t

Sorry if that looks strange. =/

I got it down to this:

2t-1
______
t(1-t)
__________
-1
______
t(1+t)

I have no idea if that's right though, and I don't know where to go from there.


I'm really sorry if this is off topic.

It's a friend of mine who needs the help, and I have no idea what type of math this is, so I thought some great mind here could help her out. :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm also having problems with a word problem. I think I set it up right... but I'm not getting to a solution that can be worked out. x_x At least. This doesn't look easily solvable:
.5x² + 50x - 280000 = 0

I'll try it a different way...
 
Isolex said:
I'm also having problems with a word problem. I think I set it up right... but I'm not getting to a solution that can be worked out. x_x At least. This doesn't look easily solvable:
.5x² + 50x - 280000 = 0

I'll try it a different way...

Thread moved from Physics to Math. Isolex, use the Binomial theorem to solve this. Look it up at wikipedia.org if you don't have it in your textbook for some reason.

And the math in your first post is hard to follow with the way you've laid it out. Can you maybe re-try and just put each equation on one line and use parenthesis to show the groupings? (Better yet would be to use LaTex as described in the Tutorials forum, but we can leave that for later...)
 
Okay,

We solved the word problem, thanks to you!

We're going to try to make a picture for the other one.
 
eewmathproblem.jpg
 
Er. That didn't work. Lol.

But yeah, there's the problem. :D
 
http://www.img.photobucket.com/albums/v285/Azari/eewmathproblem.jpg

Sorry, I'm just playing around and figuring this out. Heh.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's right so far.

But what is it supposed to equal? Otherwise you can't solve it.

But to simplify it further, use the fact that

[tex]\frac{\frac{a}{b}}{\frac{c}{d}} = \frac{ad}{bc}[/tex]
 
[tex]\frac {\frac {1}{1-t} - \frac {1}{t}}{\frac {1}{1+t} - \frac {1}{t}}[/tex].

Multiply the whole fraction by t/t, which is just one. One times anything is the same thing. Once we times it by t/t we get:

[tex]\frac{\frac{t}{1-t} -1}{\frac{t}{1+t}-1}}[/tex]

Times it all by (t+1)/(t+1), since that's just one again.

We get:
[tex]\frac{\frac{t(t+1)}{1-t} - (t+1)}{t-(t+1)}[/tex].

As you Can see, the bottom cancels out to 1.

We are left with
[tex]\frac{t(t+1)}{1-t} - (t+1)}[/tex]

Multiply the 2nd part, -(t+1), by (1-t/(1-t), since that's just 1. Then put it all on one big fraction.

[tex]\frac{t(t+1) - (1-t)(t+1)}{1-t}[/tex]

Bring the (t+1) terms together, and we get our simplest form of the equation:

<< Last result deleted by berkeman >>

Hope that helps :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Gib_Z, remember not to post complete solutions in the homework forums. Our job here (according to the PF rules that you agreed to) is to provide hints and guidance, not complete solutions.

I'm going to leave your post, however (except I deleted your final result). This is a simple enough problem and you did a nice job with LaTex, so it will probably help the OP in this case to learn how to work the problem. In the future, leave most of the final steps out -- just provide a framework that helps the OP to get going.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Sorry about that, I didn't actually read the rules..Ill make sure I adhere to them now. Thats for not deleting my post, the LaTex did take a while :) ty
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K