Is this the correct approach? (finding frequency of oscillation)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the frequency of small oscillations around the minimum of the potential function U(x) = 1 - e^(-x^2). The solution involves performing a Taylor expansion of U(x) at x = 0, resulting in an approximation U(x) ≈ x^2. The force derived from this potential is F = -2x, leading to the differential equation mx'' + 2x = 0. The angular frequency is determined to be ω = √(2/m), resulting in a frequency of ν = √(2/m)/(2π), which is dependent on mass despite the potential being mass-independent.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Taylor series expansion
  • Familiarity with classical mechanics and oscillatory motion
  • Knowledge of differential equations
  • Concept of potential energy in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Taylor series for functions
  • Learn about harmonic oscillators in classical mechanics
  • Explore the relationship between mass and frequency in oscillatory systems
  • Investigate different forms of potential energy and their effects on motion
USEFUL FOR

Students studying classical mechanics, particularly those focusing on oscillatory motion and potential energy analysis.

Sefrez
Messages
124
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the frequency of small oscillations around the minimum of the potential
U(x)=1-e^(-x^2)


Homework Equations


Force is the negative of the gradient of the potential...


The Attempt at a Solution


Given the problem statement bit, "around the minimum," I take this as a hint to find the taylor expansion of U(x) to approximate the potential at the minimum.

In doing the taylor expansion at 0, I get that:
U(x) ≈ x^2

The force on a particle in this potential is given by:
F = -dU/dx = -2x.

And so we have that:
F + 2x = 0 => mx'' + 2x = 0. Solving this differential equation, we have something of the form:
x = A*cos(√(2/m)t - [itex]\phi[/itex])

So, we have, the angular frequency to be: ω = √(2/m).

Finally, the frequency is then: [itex]\nu[/itex] = ω/(2∏) = √(2/m)/(2∏) = (2m∏^2)^(-1/2)

Does this seem correct? I was a little confused that the frequency is dependent on the mass, but then I see that the potential given is independent of mass. But that's a bit odd. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This all seems entirely correct to me.

Your teach can come up with any kind of potential he wants! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K