Is Time Quantized? | Scientific American

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter CaptDude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    quantized Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of quantized time, specifically referencing the work of William G. Tifft, a professor at the University of Arizona, who proposed the idea of redshift periodicity in 1973. Despite initial interest from the non-traditional cosmology community, subsequent large redshift surveys, including studies by Hawkins and Tang, have largely debunked the notion of quantized redshift. The prevailing consensus among astronomers is that the idea of quantized redshift lacks empirical support and is considered a defunct theory in modern cosmology.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of redshift and its implications in astronomy
  • Familiarity with cosmological theories and models
  • Knowledge of statistical analysis in astronomical surveys
  • Awareness of key studies in cosmology, particularly those involving large sample sizes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of redshift in cosmology and its measurement techniques
  • Study the findings of the 2dF Redshift Survey and its impact on cosmological theories
  • Examine the Sloan Digital Sky Survey data and its contributions to understanding redshift
  • Explore alternative theories in cosmology that challenge traditional views
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and students of astrophysics interested in the validity of redshift theories and the evolution of cosmological thought.

CaptDude
Messages
29
Reaction score
9
Is time quantized? I just read an interesting article in scientific american about this subject. The following link should take you there. The most interesting part was about research done by William G. Tifft, a professor of astronomy at the University of Arizona. I was wondering what others think about his work.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-time-quantized-in-othe/
 
Space news on Phys.org
Tifft is 'credited' with first raising the prospect of redshift periodicity in 1973. It resonated with the non-traditional cosmology crowd inspiring a flurry of papers. These early studies were, however, based on small sample sizes and evidence of periodicity rapidly evaporated when large redshift surveys started appearing. Hawkins was probably the first to cast a stone with http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0208117, No Periodicities in 2dF Redshift Survey Data. Tang flung another dagger into the heart of the beast with http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0506366, Critical Examinations of QSO Redshift Periodicities and Associations with Galaxies in Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data. These sobering studies were assailed, but not defeated, by minions of the dark side. The current consensus is quantized redshift was a dead horse before it was ever beaten. Personally, I think Tiift was a mainstream kind of guy who floundered into the fetid backwaters of cosmolgy.
 
The comments below by phayez are hilarious...

as for the quantized redshifts, I never heard of it...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Drakkith

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
7K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
220
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K