Is Understanding More Important Than Test Results?

  • Thread starter Thread starter qspeechc
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between test results and understanding of course material. Participants agree that while there is a correlation, it is not absolute; a score of 85% does not necessarily indicate a deeper understanding than a score of 90%. Factors such as familiarity with test questions, the effectiveness of instructors, and the influence of tutoring and practice are highlighted as significant contributors to test performance. Ultimately, the consensus is that understanding the material is crucial, but test results also reflect the ability to apply knowledge effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of educational assessment methods
  • Familiarity with test preparation strategies
  • Knowledge of cognitive psychology principles related to learning
  • Experience with different teaching methodologies
NEXT STEPS
  • Research effective test preparation techniques, including the use of practice exams
  • Explore cognitive psychology concepts related to learning and retention
  • Investigate various teaching methodologies and their impact on student understanding
  • Examine the role of tutoring in academic performance enhancement
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and academic advisors seeking to improve educational outcomes and understand the dynamics between test performance and comprehension of material.

qspeechc
Messages
839
Reaction score
15
Hello.

How closely do you think the results you achieve in a course-- in the tests and exams-- are related to your understanding of the material? Of course, there is some correlation, but how good is it? I mean, perhaps all the problems you come across in a test are taken from your textbook, so you've seen them already, or perhapsthe material you were taught was very artificial. Certainly, if you're doing poorly in a course it's likely you haven't understood the material. But say you get 85% on a test, and someone else gets 90%, does that necessariy mean they understand the subject matter better than you?

To put it differently: is it more important to do well in a test, or to understand the subject the test is supposed to be testing you on? These may not be the same thing. But are they closely related? How closely?

It just may happen that someone else 'sees' the solution where you haven't; does that mean they understand better? Maybe you take a little longer to get to the answer, maybe for a bunch or reasons: maybe you're a bit more rigorous and need to convince yourself more, maybe when you do get it you have more insight. Maybe you're just not as smart.
What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Doing well in a course means just that, you understand the course. A good instructor will ask question and give homework that will reflect your understanding of the material. However, I have had courses that all the test questions were the same from year to year. If you studied or knew somebody from a previous year you had an advantage. Part of college is knowing how to solve a problem and get by. In the 'real world' it doesn't matter how you come up with an answer as long as it works and gets the job done.
 
I'd put it at something like 0.7 correlation. Tests measure how well you can apply the material. So knowing the material is half of it. The other is smarts and practice. People who do old tests are at an advantage also. Having a private tutor and test prep sessions also do wonders. Smarter people, who think faster, are also likely to do better.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K