Is vacuum energy infinite? If it is, how and why?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of vacuum energy, its implications in cosmology and particle physics, and its relationship to phenomena such as the Casimir effect. Participants explore whether vacuum energy is infinite and its potential connections to dark energy and the cosmological constant.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that vacuum energy is a shift in the ground state energy of a system, which is generally not of interest to particle physicists but is significant for cosmologists.
  • Others argue that vacuum energy may play a role in the cosmological constant and dark energy, which are thought to drive the universe's expansion.
  • One participant emphasizes that the Casimir effect should not be associated with the vacuum, asserting that the vacuum is defined as empty and cannot exert forces.
  • Another participant references the complexity of accurately measuring the Casimir effect in experiments and suggests that it arises from quantum fluctuations of charges in neutral solids rather than the vacuum itself.
  • Several participants provide references to academic papers for further reading on the Casimir effect and vacuum energy, indicating a desire for deeper exploration of the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of vacuum energy and its implications, particularly regarding its connection to the Casimir effect. There is no consensus on whether vacuum energy is infinite or how it should be conceptualized in relation to the vacuum state.

Contextual Notes

Some claims about the Casimir effect and vacuum energy rely on specific definitions and assumptions that may not be universally accepted. The discussion highlights the complexity and nuance surrounding these concepts.

Physics news on Phys.org
Vacuum energy is usually not of interest to particle physicists, since it can be thought of as a shift in the ground state energy (usually taken to be zero) of a system.

However, vacuum energy is of interest to cosmologists because of its possible role as a source of the cosmological constant and/or dark energy which drives the expansion of the universe.

Vacuum energy also manifests in the famous so-called Casimir effect.
 
failexam said:
Vacuum energy is usually not of interest to particle physicists, since it can be thought of as a shift in the ground state energy (usually taken to be zero) of a system.

However, vacuum energy is of interest to cosmologists because of its possible role as a source of the cosmological constant and/or dark energy which drives the expansion of the universe.

Vacuum energy also manifests in the famous so-called Casimir effect.
No, one cannot repeat often enough: The Casimir effect has nothing to do with the vacuum. By definition the vacuum is empty. There's really nothing by definition, and so there cannot be forces.

The Casimir effect is observed (although it's damn difficult to get it quantitatively accurate in experiment), and it doesn't refer to the vacuum at all. There are always overall neutral solids around, and that's far from beeing the vacuum. It consists of a lot of positive and an equal amount of negative charges, and the Casimir force results from a kind of van der Waals force due to quantum fluctuations of these charges.

The usual handwavy derivations in some QED textbooks (for a pretty good one see, e.g., Itzykson+Zuber QFT) are in fact the limit ##\alpha_{\text{em}} \rightarrow \infty##. For a thorough discussion of the facts, see the famous paper by Yaffe:

R. L. Jaffe, The Casimir effect and the quantum vacuum, Phys. Rev. D, 72 (2005), p. 021301.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.72.021301
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0503158
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby and Demystifier

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K