Is velocity technically a force? Is it drawn as vector in free-body-diagrams?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Femme_physics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Vector Velocity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Velocity is not a force and should not be included in traditional free-body diagrams (FBDs), which are specifically designed to analyze forces acting on a body. While some diagrams may depict velocities, they are more accurately termed "velocity diagrams" rather than free-body diagrams. The distinction is crucial for clarity in physics, as mixing force vectors with velocity vectors can lead to confusion. Properly constructed diagrams should serve a clear purpose and maintain unambiguous representations of the concepts being illustrated.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of free-body diagrams (FBDs)
  • Basic knowledge of physics concepts such as force and velocity
  • Familiarity with vector representation in physics
  • Ability to differentiate between static and dynamic diagrams
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of free-body diagrams and their applications in physics
  • Learn about vector representation and how to distinguish between different types of vectors
  • Explore the role of velocity and momentum in dynamic systems
  • Study the differences between static and dynamic diagrams in physics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone involved in mechanics or dynamics who seeks to clarify the distinction between forces and velocities in diagrammatic representations.

Femme_physics
Gold Member
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
1
Is "velocity" technically a force? Is it drawn as vector in free-body-diagrams?

The reaosn I'm asking that is because I was told by a physics expert that you only draw forces in free body diagrams. I also see the velocity (as well as angular velocity) indicated in a lot of free-body-diagrams in my dynamics exercises solution manual.

http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/6449/veloc.jpg Now I'm confused :confused:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Perhaps, these pictures are simply no free-body diagrams but depicting the kinematics of the motion under consideration. In free-body diagrams, you should have indeed only forces!
 


Awww, it's not as strict as all that. :smile:

A diagram needs to serve a purpose.
And it shouldn't be ambiguous.

So you should either draw "only" forces, or "only" velocities.
And still, you can mix them, if it helps explaining how something works.
But make sure then that they are easy to distinguish, for instance by using different colors.
(You like colors, don't you? :biggrin: I like smileys! :cool:)

FBD's are specifically used to analyze the forces acting on the body, which tends to be difficult to do right!
So if you want to make a proper analysis, be careful what else you put in!

The diagrams you have, show "only" velocities, making them unambiguous!
I'm not sure you would call them "free body diagrams" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_body_diagram" ), but you certainly wouldn't call them "force diagrams".
I guess you might call them "velocity diagrams"! :smile:

But really, dictionary English is not my strong suit! :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:


You can draw whatever you like in a diagram. Just don't add force vectors to velocity vectors, or apples to oranges, or...
 


Force diagram - Velocity diagrams

My brain welcomes your logic! Thanks, ILS :)

And thanks vanhees for feedbacking^^
 


Obviously a "velocity" is not a "force"...just look at the units for each...

But as noted, you can draw what you like to help explain a situation. In static diagrams there is often no ambiguity about direction and motion, say due to gravity; but in dynamic situations it can be helpful to include velocity/momentum direction...also more here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_body_diagram
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
8K