MHB Is x^(2/3)(5/2-x) a Continuous Function for All Values of x?

Click For Summary
The function x^(2/3)(5/2 - x) is continuous for all values of x, despite appearing disjointed at x = 0. The limit as x approaches 0 is 0 from both sides, confirming continuity at that point. Both components, x^(2/3) and (5/2 - x), are continuous functions, which means their product is also continuous. However, there is a cusp at x = 0, indicating that while the function is continuous, it is not differentiable at that point. Understanding the continuity of functions often involves analyzing their algebraic components rather than relying solely on first principles.
tmt1
Messages
230
Reaction score
0
Is $$x^\frac{2}{3} (\frac{5}{2} - x)$$ a continuous function for all values of x?

It seems disjointed at $x = 0$ but the limit as x approaches 0 is 0 from both sides of x.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
tmt said:
Is $$x^\frac{2}{3} (\frac{5}{2} - x)$$ a continuous function for all values of x?

It seems disjointed at $x = 0$ but the limit as x approaches 0 is 0 from both sides of x.

Product of two continuous functions is continuous. Both $x^{2/3}$ and $5/2-x$ are continuous, and thus $x^{2/3}(5/2-x)$ is also continuous.

In general, when face with the problem of figuring out whether or not a certain function is continuous, one should use the first principles only as a last resort. One should try to break down the problem into pieces by identifying the algebraic components of the function, that is seeing if the function is sum or product of ratio of two continuous functions. Then one should try to see if the function can be written as a composite of two continuous functions, etc.
 
There is a cusp at x= 0. The function is continuous at x= 0 but not differentiable there.
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
830
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K