Is Z[T]/(T^3) a Field Due to T^3's Irreducibility?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter peteryellow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Prime Radical
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the structure of the ring Z[T]/(T^3) and whether it can be classified as a field due to the irreducibility of T^3 over Z[T]. Participants are exploring concepts related to prime and Jacobson radicals, as well as the ideal structure within this ring.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that Z[T]/(T^3) is a field because T^3 is irreducible over Z[T], suggesting that 0 is the prime and Jacobson radical.
  • Another participant counters that T^3 is not irreducible and seeks clarification on the structure of prime and maximal ideals in Z[T]/(T^3).
  • A participant prompts a more abstract consideration of the ideal structure of R/I, where R is a ring and I is an ideal.
  • Questions are raised about nilpotent elements and their relation to prime ideals, including inquiries about the converse situation for non-nilpotent elements.
  • Definitions of Jacobson and prime radicals are discussed, with one participant expressing confusion over these concepts.
  • A participant notes that the prime radical consists of nilpotent elements in a commutative ring, and this applies to the Jacobson radical in finitely-generated rings.
  • Another participant requests guidance on identifying prime and maximal ideals within the ring.
  • There is a mention of a more elegant method proposed by a participant, suggesting alternative approaches to the problem.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of examining nilpotent elements when searching for prime ideals.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the irreducibility of T^3 and whether Z[T]/(T^3) can be classified as a field. There are multiple competing views on the nature of prime and maximal ideals, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying definitions and understandings of the Jacobson and prime radicals, which may lead to confusion. The discussion also touches on the implications of nilpotent elements in relation to ideal structures, but these concepts are not fully resolved.

peteryellow
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
I want to find prime and jacobson radical radicals in Z[T]/(T^3), here Z = integers.

Is it true that Z[T]/(T^3) is a field, because T^3 is irreducibel over Z[T]. If it is true that
Z[T]/(T^3) is a field then 0 is the prime and jacobson radical radical.

Is it true please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No T^3 is not irreducible, so can some body help me that how does prime and maximal ideals in Z[T]/(T^3) look like.
 
Think about this abstractly: if R is a ring with an ideal I, what can you say about the ideal structure of R/I?
 
if x is nilpotent, i.e. some positive power of x is zero, then what prime ideals does x lie in?what about the converse question? if x is not nilpotent, can you find a prime ideal not containing x? (do you know about localizing a ring at powers of an element?)
 
No I don't understand what you are saying mathwonk. My definition of jacobson radical is that it is intersection of maximal ideals and prime radical iks intersection of prime radical.
 
mathwonk is alluding to the fact that the prime radical of (a commutative ring) R is nothing but the set of all nilpotent elements in R. The same comment applies to the Jacobson radical of R whenever R is finitely-generated (as a Z-module).
 
But Morphism can you please tell me that what are prime and maximal ideals of the ring, and how can I FIND THEM. PLEASE HELP. THNAKS
 
But why? mathwonk's method is much more elegant.
 
the point is that if you are looking for prime ideals you should look at nilpotent elements.
 

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K