What is time? Which books are reccomended?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robert100
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the nature of time, exploring various philosophical and scientific perspectives. Participants seek recommendations for books and authors that address the topic, highlighting a range of views from both physics and philosophy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant is currently reading "The Arrow of Time" by Peter Coveney and Roger Highfield and finds it promising.
  • Another participant suggests "About Time: Einstein's Unfinished Revolution" by Paul Davies as a more accessible text.
  • Books mentioned for further exploration include "World in Process" by John A. Jungerman, which connects modern physics to process thought.
  • "Time's Arrow and Archimedes' Point: New Directions for the Physics of Time" by Huw Price is noted for its critical stance on Coveney and Highfield's work.
  • Participants mention "Travels in Four Dimensions: The Enigmas of Space and Time" by Robin Le Poidevin and "The End of Certainty" by Ilya Prigogine as additional readings.
  • Julian Barbour's "The End of Time" is discussed, with one participant noting that Barbour argues time is an illusion, while others in the physics community may disagree with this view.
  • Victor Stenger's "Time Reality" is also mentioned as a potential read.
  • One participant expresses concern that physicists may overlook philosophical discussions on time, questioning the interaction between philosophy and physics communities.
  • Another participant recommends "A Brief History of Time" by Stephen Hawking and its companion "A Briefer History of Time" by Hawking and Mlodinow.
  • Igor Novikov's "The River of Time" is also suggested as a valuable resource on the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of opinions on the recommended books and authors, with no consensus on which texts are most authoritative or comprehensive. The discussion reflects differing views on the relationship between physics and philosophy regarding the nature of time.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the lack of interaction between physicists and philosophers, suggesting a potential gap in interdisciplinary communication that remains unresolved.

Robert100
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
I'm interested in learning about the nature of time. I know that modern physics and philosophy has no firm conclusions on this issue, but I want to read about the various views that serious thinkers have developed about time.

Would readers of this forum comment on the following books/authors?

I am presently reading through "The Arrow of Time" Peter Coveney and Roger Highfield, and it appears very good.

A more popular text that also appears good, but in much less detail, is "About Time: Einstein's Unfinished Revolution" by Paul Davies.


Any comments about the following books? (I haven't read them yet)

"World in Process" John A. Jungerman. He discusses modern physics and cosmology; also connects those ideas to process thought.

"Time's Arrow and Archimedes' Point: New Directions for the Physics of Time" Huw Price. Price has criticised several points made by Coveney and Highfield, and his name comes up a lot. What do people think of his work?

"Travels in Four Dimensions: The Enigmas of Space and Time" Robin Le Poidevin

"The End of Certainty" Ilya Prigogine.

"The End of Time" Julian Barbour - Here Barbour argues that time literally is an illusion, and that we live in a timeless reality. I know that he is respected, but considered totally mistaken, by the physics community.

"Time Reality" - Victor Stenger.

Any suggestions or constructive criticism on any of these books/authors would be most welcome!

On a separate note:
From the many articles and webistes I have read, plus the above two books, it seems that most physicists only study the works of other physicists. They seem to ignore most of the papers on the nature of time that come from the philosophy community. Any ideas why this is so? Do members of academy who study philosophy make an effort to get in touch with physicists, attend physics conferences, work with the local physics professors, etc.?


Robert
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sure you posted this the other day. Anyway, I'll say what I said then, incase you didn't see it. I read a good book a while ago on this topic: it was called "The River of Time" and is by Igor Novikov.
 
cristo said:
I'm sure you posted this the other day. Anyway, I'll say what I said then, incase you didn't see it. I read a good book a while ago on this topic: it was called "The River of Time" and is by Igor Novikov.

Ack! You're right, cristo. Here is the other (mostly duplicate) thread:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=178136

Robert100, duplicate posts are not allowed here on the PF. I'm going to lock this thread, and ask anybody who wants to respond to this question to please follow the link and respond in the other thread.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
972
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
9K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
13K
Replies
7
Views
4K